Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🔧 MAINTAIN: Distribute type data (PEP 561) #74

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 14, 2020

Conversation

hukkin
Copy link
Member

@hukkin hukkin commented Nov 9, 2020

This PR makes type annotations available to downstream projects.

Might be a good idea to merge this only after #64

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 9, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #74 (7b1b0d0) into master (b16ee04) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #74   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.75%   95.75%           
=======================================
  Files          78       78           
  Lines        3984     3984           
=======================================
  Hits         3815     3815           
  Misses        169      169           
Flag Coverage Δ
pytests 95.75% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b16ee04...7b1b0d0. Read the comment docs.

@hukkin hukkin changed the title Distribute type data (PEP 561) ✨ NEW: Distribute type data (PEP 561) Dec 13, 2020
@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell changed the title ✨ NEW: Distribute type data (PEP 561) 🔧 MAINTAIN: Distribute type data (PEP 561) Dec 14, 2020
@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell merged commit 5ef2bd7 into executablebooks:master Dec 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants