Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we forgo any missing exercises #417

Closed
behrtam opened this issue Feb 22, 2017 · 15 comments
Closed

Should we forgo any missing exercises #417

behrtam opened this issue Feb 22, 2017 · 15 comments

Comments

@behrtam
Copy link
Contributor

behrtam commented Feb 22, 2017

Right now there are 36 exercises that are not yet part of the python track. Besides implementing or finishing those, there is also the option (config.json#L465) to decide not to implement certain problems if they don't make sense for this track.

  • markdown
  • bank-account
  • pov
  • tournament
  • dot-dsl
  • connect
  • two-bucket
  • sgf-parsing
  • zipper
  • ledger
  • nucleotide-codons
  • simple-linked-list dibs: implement simple-linked-list #385
  • forth
  • binary-search-tree dibs: implement binary-search-tree #388
  • scale-generator
  • tree-building
  • error-handling
  • transpose
  • react
  • parallel-letter-frequency
  • hangman
  • variable-length-quantity
  • alphametics
  • custom-set
  • diffie-hellman
  • change
  • protein-translation
  • counter
  • lens-person
  • go-counting
  • word-search
  • bowling
  • dominoes
  • food-chain
  • paasio
@behrtam behrtam changed the title Implement or forgo missing exercises Should we forgo any missing exercises Mar 22, 2017
@stale stale bot added on hiatus and removed on hiatus labels May 6, 2017
@skabbass1
Copy link

@behrtam
Are you still looking for contributions on this issue ( implementing the 36 exercises not part of the python track). Also just curious to know why you think certain problems don't make sense for the python track (I haven't looked through all the exercises so just asking for my information :) )

@devkabiir
Copy link

devkabiir commented Oct 3, 2017

@behrtam I can contribute binary-search-tree exercise should I open a new issue for it or reference the closed one #388 in my PR
I'm interested in learning all the other exercises yet to be implemented and then contributing them.

@ilya-khadykin
Copy link
Contributor

@kabiir, that is awesome.
I'm planning to open issues for these exercises as part of Hacktoberfest. Will it work for you?

@devkabiir
Copy link

@m-a-ge Yes of course! I'm excited to start coding.

@cmccandless
Copy link
Contributor

I've implemented dominoes at #726.

@ilya-khadykin
Copy link
Contributor

Updated list of not yet implemented exercises excluding deprecated ones and those which were implemented since Feb 22 (24 in total):

@ilya-khadykin
Copy link
Contributor

@kabiir I've created issues as promised 😉

@thecouchcoder
Copy link
Contributor

Is Bowling deprecated? It's on the unimplemented list, but I don't see an issue for it. If it's up for grabs I can do it when I finish my current PR.

@ilya-khadykin
Copy link
Contributor

ilya-khadykin commented Oct 10, 2017

@aes421 hm, looks like I've missed that exercise somehow.
Feel free to open a new PR any time (there is no need to wait until your other PRs are merged). Only make sure you'll use different branch based on upstream/master when you start working.
Link to Problem Specification for the exercise - https://github.com/exercism/problem-specifications/tree/master/exercises/bowling

@cmccandless
Copy link
Contributor

cmccandless commented Feb 15, 2018

Updated list of unimplemented exercises:

  • affine-cipher
  • hangman
  • passio

@pythonmite
Copy link

Hello Team,

Can you please confirm whether affine-cipher exercise has been solved or not. if not I would like to present a solution for the same.

@cmccandless
Copy link
Contributor

@pythonmite affine-cipher has already been implemented.

If you are still interested in contributing here, please check our list of open issues.

@andrefpoliveira
Copy link

Hey! I would like to implement a new exercise. But I don't know Passio. Can you explain? Thank you!

@cmccandless
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @andrefpoliveira !

Actually we just merged #2195, which implements passio. And there is an open PR for hangman which was placed on hold by the maintainers. However...

We have a great deal of work still needed for our new Concept exercises. By the launch of v3, they will be relocated to this repository, but for now, they are being developed for all language tracks here: https://github.com/exercism/v3. We would greatly appreciate contribution there! If you wish to keep to the Python track, simply look at the open issues here: https://github.com/exercism/v3/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc++python.

@cmccandless
Copy link
Contributor

Regarding this issue: all unimplemented issues from problem-specifications have either been implemented or put on hold, so this issue will be closed.

This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants