hangman: implement exercise

[ilya-khadykin]

There are exercises that are not yet implemented in Python track (the full list of them - #417 (comment)).
You can help us change this situation by implementing this one. Ref #417

The guide "Implement an exercise from specification" will help you succeed.

If you still have questions, I encourage you to ask them before starting working on the issue.

I also suggest claiming the issue by creating an empty PR as stated here

Please note that there are some special 'closing issue' keywords that you can put in description of your PR and Github will take care of closing the corresponding issue automatically after merge.
This simple thing helps us a lot, and makes our life a bit easier

[vaibhavsingh97]

can i take up this issue?

[ilya-khadykin]

@vaibhavsingh97 of course

I suggest creating an empty [WIP] PR - https://github.com/exercism/docs/blob/master/you-can-help/implement-an-exercise-from-specification.md#avoiding-duplicate-work to claim it

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as abandoned because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[khoa102]

Hi, I wonder if I can take up this issues as my first contribution for open source?

[cmccandless]

@khoa102 Absolutely! Issues can be claimed by creating a PR for them. Please remember to put Fixes #745 in the PR description to link the PR to this issue.

[khoa102]

Great! @cmccandless

[khoa102]

Hi, can anyone take a look at the PR for this issue that I submit a few day ago? I would also want to know what should I put for the config of this exercise, like the difficulty, unlock or topic?

[anshima1]

Hey is this issue solved? If not, I'll like to work on it.

[cmccandless]

@anshima1 No, this issue is not yet resolved.

If you wish to work on this, I highly suggest reviewing the discussion in #1160.

[junming403]

Hi is this issue still relevant? I would like to work on it. Do i need to open an PR to claim it first?

[cmccandless]

@junming403 It is still relevant, yes.

Also, as stated above:

If you wish to work on this, I highly suggest reviewing the discussion in #1160.

[junming403]

Hi thank you for the prompt response! I have looked at the thread of discussion. Notice it did not use FRP, I am considering make this exercise based on FRP library(http://reactivex.io/intro.html). What should do if the exercise rely on the library? Any guidance?

[cmccandless]

RE: the track README

We use unittest (Python Standard Library) and no 3rd-party-framework.

It would be preferable that we stick to that.