Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add list-ops exercise #205

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2024
Merged

Conversation

danilopiazza
Copy link
Contributor

Add the List Ops exercise to the x86-64 Assembly track.

See also: https://forum.exercism.org/t/x86-64-assembly-add-list-ops-exercise/9799

This exercise is implemented using arrays, mostly to avoid memory allocation (as suggested in PR #156); this made the length function pointless.

Like in the C track, reversing nested lists and concat are not implemented.

Copy link

Hello. Thanks for opening a PR on Exercism 🙂

We ask that all changes to Exercism are discussed on our Community Forum before being opened on GitHub. To enforce this, we automatically close all PRs that are submitted. That doesn't mean your PR is rejected but that we want the initial discussion about it to happen on our forum where a wide range of key contributors across the Exercism ecosystem can weigh in.

You can use this link to copy this into a new topic on the forum. If we decide the PR is appropriate, we'll reopen it and continue with it, so please don't delete your local branch.

If you're interested in learning more about this auto-responder, please read this blog post.


Note: If this PR has been pre-approved, please link back to this PR on the forum thread and a maintainer or staff member will reopen it.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Feb 28, 2024
@ErikSchierboom ErikSchierboom merged commit 74b43cb into exercism:main Feb 29, 2024
9 checks passed
@danilopiazza danilopiazza deleted the list-ops branch February 29, 2024 14:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants