-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Doe categorical #243
Doe categorical #243
Conversation
…les and writing tests
… of column keys in dataframe
…ign/bofire into doe_categorical
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine to me! Thank you so much for all the great work @ufukguenes 💯
@dlinzner-bcs and @ufukguenes : have you seen that the pyright test was not passing when you merged the PR in? |
@jduerholt yes I saw that. I plan to clean it up asap. Is this critical? We wanted to have the additional functionality before ufuk left. |
Hmm, I am also a bit irritated that we still have additional feature types in, I thought that we agreed on not having additional ones ... |
Honestly, I would prefer to revert the merge and proper discuss it and see if we can do it without the addional features. |
This reverts commit 126393e.
Attempt at including categorical variables and discrete variables in DOE. Solving with exhaustive search and branch-and-bound