Expose arrayLimit

[mike-zorn]

I've run into the same issue as #46, so I've extended the api to allow that to be set, but in a way which doesn't make the dependency on qs so obvious.

[dougwilson]

Hi! Please read the discussion over at #55 (comment) while I look at your PR. The gist is unless the option will change the behavior of extended: false in some way, it won't be added.

[mike-zorn]

Ah, OK. Sounds like this one isn't welcome then. 😛

[dougwilson]

Well, it's not that it's not welcome, per. se., but just starts to tightly bind our interface to the qs interface instead of a general urlencoded interface. I do want people to, in the end, choose these options, though. In fact, in the next major, arrayLimit for the standard extended: true will just be 0, as it's the most sane option, i.m.o :)

[mike-zorn]

If anyone is looking for this before v2 comes out, I made a module which is the workaround suggested in #55.

[jcready]

👍