Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid setting SortedProperties twice #136

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2024
Merged

Avoid setting SortedProperties twice #136

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2024

Conversation

gastaldi
Copy link
Contributor

@gastaldi gastaldi commented Apr 2, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Modified the handling of properties in Maven models to no longer sort them before returning.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent update in the project primarily focuses on the modification of how properties within Maven models are handled. Specifically, the alteration removes the step of sorting properties in the Model object, which marks a significant shift in the approach towards managing properties, potentially impacting the build configuration and dependency resolution processes in Maven-based projects.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/main/java/.../Maven.java Removed sorting of properties in the Model object.

🐰✨
In the land of code, where the Maven dwells,
A rabbit hopped in, with changes to tell.
"No more sorting," it said with a cheer,
"Let properties roam, far and near."
🌟📚 Let's celebrate the shift, with joy and might,
For in every change, there's a light.
🚀🐇💫

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1927304 and 4f8794a.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/main/java/io/fabric8/maven/Maven.java (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/main/java/io/fabric8/maven/Maven.java (1)

64-69: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [77-82]

The removal of sorting operations for Model properties in this method aligns with the PR's objective to optimize property handling by eliminating redundant processes. However, it's crucial to ensure that this change does not inadvertently affect the expected behavior of the Model object in downstream processes where sorted properties might be assumed.

Ensure that the removal of sorted properties does not negatively impact any downstream processes or functionalities that might rely on the properties being sorted. This can be verified by reviewing usage patterns of the Model object's properties within the project and potentially adding test cases to cover scenarios where sorted properties might be expected.

@gastaldi gastaldi merged commit d88577c into main Apr 2, 2024
1 check passed
@gastaldi gastaldi deleted the double_sorted_props branch April 2, 2024 13:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant