-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support grouped focus for switch #40739
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
label
Oct 9, 2023
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D50068169 |
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D50068169 |
carmenvkrol
added a commit
to carmenvkrol/react-native
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2023
Summary: Adding support for grouped accessibility focus on switch. This is when the switch itself shouldn't be directly focusable. Instead, the parent element should be focusable, including announcing the switch role and state changes, e.g. "on" and "off". Fix this issue in a couple ways: 1. Make sure to set the proper role for switch in FbReactSwitchCompat.java. 2. Set the state description in SwitchCompat.java so that uses the correct announcement of "off" and "on" instead of "checked" and "unchecked". Reviewed By: blavalla Differential Revision: D50068169
carmenvkrol
force-pushed
the
export-D50068169
branch
from
October 9, 2023 18:33
04e62b2
to
a5337a5
Compare
Summary: Adding support for grouped accessibility focus on switch. This is when the switch itself shouldn't be directly focusable. Instead, the parent element should be focusable, including announcing the switch role and state changes, e.g. "on" and "off". Fix this issue in a couple ways: 1. Make sure to set the proper role for switch in FbReactSwitchCompat.java. 2. Set the state description in SwitchCompat.java so that uses the correct announcement of "off" and "on" instead of "checked" and "unchecked". Reviewed By: blavalla Differential Revision: D50068169
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D50068169 |
carmenvkrol
force-pushed
the
export-D50068169
branch
from
October 9, 2023 19:00
a5337a5
to
f0cf2a1
Compare
Base commit: 29dce4d |
This pull request has been merged in 06c295c. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed
This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
fb-exported
Merged
This PR has been merged.
p: Facebook
Partner: Facebook
Partner
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
Adding support for grouped accessibility focus on switch. This is when the switch itself shouldn't be directly focusable. Instead, the parent element should be focusable, including announcing the switch role and state changes, e.g. "on" and "off".
Fix this issue in a couple ways:
Reviewed By: blavalla
Differential Revision: D50068169