Fix tests: Add dfsEffectsRefactor flag

Some of the tests that gated on the effects refactor used the `new`
flag. In order to bisect, we'll need to decompose the new fork changes
into multiple steps.

So I added a hardcoded test flag called `dfsEffectsRefactor` and set it
to false. Will turn back on when we switch back to traversing the
finished tree using DFS and `subtreeTag`.

packages/react-dom/src/__tests__/ReactDOMServerPartialHydration-test.internal.js

@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ describe('ReactDOMServerPartialHydration', () => {
     // This is a new node.
     expect(span).not.toBe(span2);
 
-    if (gate(flags => flags.new)) {
+    if (gate(flags => flags.dfsEffectsRefactor)) {
       // The effects list refactor causes this to be null because the Suspense Offscreen's child
       // is null. However, since we can't hydrate Suspense in legacy this change in behavior is ok
       expect(ref.current).toBe(null);

packages/react-dom/src/__tests__/ReactWrongReturnPointer-test.js

@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ beforeEach(() => {
 });
 
 // Don't feel too guilty if you have to delete this test.
+// @gate dfsEffectsRefactor
 // @gate new
 // @gate __DEV__
 test('warns in DEV if return pointer is inconsistent', async () => {

packages/react-reconciler/src/__tests__/ReactDoubleInvokeEvents-test.internal.js

@@ -19,13 +19,20 @@ describe('ReactDoubleInvokeEvents', () => {
   beforeEach(() => {
     jest.resetModules();
     React = require('react');
-    ReactFeatureFlags = require('shared/ReactFeatureFlags');
     ReactTestRenderer = require('react-test-renderer');
     Scheduler = require('scheduler');
-    ReactFeatureFlags.enableDoubleInvokingEffects = __VARIANT__;
     act = ReactTestRenderer.unstable_concurrentAct;
   });
 
+  function supportsDoubleInvokeEffects() {
+    return gate(
+      flags =>
+        flags.build === 'development' &&
+        flags.enableDoubleInvokingEffects &&
+        flags.dfsEffectsRefactor,
+    );
+  }
+
   it('should not double invoke effects in legacy mode', () => {
     function App({text}) {
       React.useEffect(() => {
@@ -73,7 +80,7 @@ describe('ReactDoubleInvokeEvents', () => {
       });
     });
 
-    if (__DEV__ && __VARIANT__) {
+    if (supportsDoubleInvokeEffects()) {
       expect(Scheduler).toHaveYielded([
         'useLayoutEffect mount',
         'useEffect mount',
@@ -132,7 +139,7 @@ describe('ReactDoubleInvokeEvents', () => {
       });
     });
 
-    if (__DEV__ && __VARIANT__) {
+    if (supportsDoubleInvokeEffects()) {
       expect(Scheduler).toHaveYielded([
         'useEffect One mount',
         'useEffect Two mount',
@@ -193,7 +200,7 @@ describe('ReactDoubleInvokeEvents', () => {
       });
     });
 
-    if (__DEV__ && __VARIANT__) {
+    if (supportsDoubleInvokeEffects()) {
       expect(Scheduler).toHaveYielded([
         'useLayoutEffect One mount',
         'useLayoutEffect Two mount',
@@ -250,7 +257,7 @@ describe('ReactDoubleInvokeEvents', () => {
       });
     });
 
-    if (__DEV__ && __VARIANT__) {
+    if (supportsDoubleInvokeEffects()) {
       expect(Scheduler).toHaveYielded([
         'useLayoutEffect mount',
         'useEffect mount',
@@ -308,7 +315,7 @@ describe('ReactDoubleInvokeEvents', () => {
       ReactTestRenderer.create(<App />, {unstable_isConcurrent: true});
     });
 
-    if (__DEV__ && __VARIANT__) {
+    if (supportsDoubleInvokeEffects()) {
       expect(Scheduler).toHaveYielded([
         'componentDidMount',
         'componentWillUnmount',
@@ -345,7 +352,7 @@ describe('ReactDoubleInvokeEvents', () => {
       });
     });
 
-    if (__DEV__ && __VARIANT__) {
+    if (supportsDoubleInvokeEffects()) {
       expect(Scheduler).toHaveYielded([
         'componentDidMount',
         'componentWillUnmount',
@@ -420,7 +427,7 @@ describe('ReactDoubleInvokeEvents', () => {
       });
     });
 
-    if (__DEV__ && __VARIANT__) {
+    if (supportsDoubleInvokeEffects()) {
       expect(Scheduler).toHaveYielded([
         'mount',
         'useLayoutEffect mount',
@@ -485,7 +492,7 @@ describe('ReactDoubleInvokeEvents', () => {
       ReactTestRenderer.create(<App />, {unstable_isConcurrent: true});
     });
 
-    if (__DEV__ && __VARIANT__) {
+    if (supportsDoubleInvokeEffects()) {
       expect(Scheduler).toHaveYielded([
         'App useLayoutEffect mount',
         'App useEffect mount',
@@ -505,7 +512,7 @@ describe('ReactDoubleInvokeEvents', () => {
       _setShowChild(true);
     });
 
-    if (__DEV__ && __VARIANT__) {
+    if (supportsDoubleInvokeEffects()) {
       expect(Scheduler).toHaveYielded([
         'App useLayoutEffect unmount',
         'Child useLayoutEffect mount',
@@ -573,7 +580,7 @@ describe('ReactDoubleInvokeEvents', () => {
       });
     });
 
-    if (__DEV__ && __VARIANT__) {
+    if (supportsDoubleInvokeEffects()) {
       expect(Scheduler).toHaveYielded([
         'componentDidMount',
         'useLayoutEffect mount',

packages/react/src/__tests__/ReactDOMTracing-test.internal.js

@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ describe('ReactDOMTracing', () => {
           onInteractionScheduledWorkCompleted,
         ).toHaveBeenLastNotifiedOfInteraction(interaction);
 
-        if (gate(flags => flags.new)) {
+        if (gate(flags => flags.dfsEffectsRefactor)) {
           expect(onRender).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(3);
         } else {
           // TODO: This is 4 instead of 3 because this update was scheduled at
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ describe('ReactDOMTracing', () => {
         expect(
           onInteractionScheduledWorkCompleted,
         ).toHaveBeenLastNotifiedOfInteraction(interaction);
-        if (gate(flags => flags.new)) {
+        if (gate(flags => flags.dfsEffectsRefactor)) {
           expect(onRender).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(3);
         } else {
           // TODO: This is 4 instead of 3 because this update was scheduled at

packages/react/src/__tests__/ReactProfiler-test.internal.js

@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ describe('Profiler', () => {
 
         renderer.update(<App />);
 
-        if (gate(flags => flags.new)) {
+        if (gate(flags => flags.dfsEffectsRefactor)) {
           // None of the Profiler's subtree was rendered because App bailed out before the Profiler.
           // So we expect onRender not to be called.
           expect(callback).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
@@ -4292,7 +4292,7 @@ describe('Profiler', () => {
         // because the resolved suspended subtree doesn't contain any passive effects.
         // If <AsyncComponentWithCascadingWork> or its decendents had a passive effect,
         // onPostCommit would be called again.
-        if (gate(flags => flags.new)) {
+        if (gate(flags => flags.dfsEffectsRefactor)) {
           expect(Scheduler).toFlushAndYield([]);
         } else {
           expect(Scheduler).toFlushAndYield(['onPostCommit']);
@@ -4783,7 +4783,8 @@ describe('Profiler', () => {
       });
 
       if (__DEV__) {
-        // @gate new
+        // @gate dfsEffectsRefactor
+        // @gate enableDoubleInvokingEffects
         it('double invoking does not disconnect wrapped async work', () => {
           ReactFeatureFlags.enableDoubleInvokingEffects = true;
 

scripts/jest/TestFlags.js

@@ -44,6 +44,10 @@ const environmentFlags = {
 
   // Use this for tests that are known to be broken.
   FIXME: false,
+
+  // Turn this flag back on (or delete) once the effect list is removed in favor
+  // of a depth-first traversal using `subtreeTags`.
+  dfsEffectsRefactor: false,
 };
 
 function getTestFlags() {