Bug: yarn flow dom does not exist, so console should suggest yarn flo…

…w dom-node (#26213)

<!--
  Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.

Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:

1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
  2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
  9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
  10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.

Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->

## Summary
The `yarn flow` command, as suggested for every PR Submission (Task No.
9), tells us `The yarn flow command now requires you to pick a primary
renderer` and provides a list for the same. However, in at the bottom of
the prompt, it suggests `If you are not sure, run yarn flow dom`. This
command `yarn flow dom` does not exist in the list and thus the command
does nothing and exits with `status code 1` without any flow test.

<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
While trying to submit a different PR for code cleaning, just during
submission I read the PR Guidelines, and while doing `yarn test`, `yarn
lint`, and `yarn flow`, I came across this issue and thought of
submitting a PR for the same.

## How did you test this change?
Since this code change does not change any logic, just the text
information, I only ran `yarn linc` and `yarn test` for the same.

<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
  If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
Here is how the issue currently looks like:

![facebook yarn flow
dom](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/20269286/220337686-b8a9b786-92e0-4c66-88a9-e94bfbed6edf.JPG)

Signed-off-by: abhiram11 <abhiramsatpute@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: abhiram11 <abhiramsatpute@gmail.com>

scripts/tasks/flow.js

@@ -34,7 +34,9 @@ if (!primaryRenderer) {
     }
   });
   console.log();
-  console.log('If you are not sure, run ' + chalk.green('yarn flow dom') + '.');
+  console.log(
+    'If you are not sure, run ' + chalk.green('yarn flow dom-node') + '.'
+  );
   console.log(
     'This will still typecheck non-DOM packages, although less precisely.'
   );