Switch to gender neutral terms #24225
Conversation
|
Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. Action RequiredIn order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you. ProcessIn order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@fb.com. Thanks! |
| @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ describe('InspectedElement', () => { | |||
| const Wrapper = ({children}) => children; | |||
| const Target = React.memo(props => { | |||
| targetRenderCount++; | |||
| // Even though his hook isn't referenced, it's used to observe backend rendering. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is supposed to be "this"
|
Thanks for the PR, but this approach is not productive. It's only creating noise.
Please don't use bots on this repository. |
|
I should note if there are actual examples of unnecessarily gendered language in the React repo, we will happily take the fix. This is not an example of that, and judging by PRs like freeCodeCamp/freeCodeCamp#45569, this bot could use a lot of work before it's good enough to send PRs. |
Hey! We noticed your repository had a few instances of gendered language. We've attempted to make the changes to gender neutral language :)
You can learn more about this project and why gender neutral language matters at inclusivecoding.wixsite.com. If you have feedback for this bot, please provide it here.