-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix input tracking bug #26627
Fix input tracking bug #26627
Conversation
Comparing: d121c67...38134f5 Critical size changesIncludes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Significant size changesIncludes any change greater than 0.2%: (No significant changes) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Confirmed this fixes the repo too 🤘
I don't get this part. One is lastProps and one is nextProps so they wouldn't have to be specified at the same time.
We might not remove the attribute in the second case if we're syncing input attributes, but we would if we're not. Regardless it's not for the stated reason. Not sure if this helps. |
|
I see. I guess I don't consider that warning very reliable. Since it can happen at very unexpected ways late in prod and not development. E.g. unexpected reconciliation of two cases. |
In facebook@2019ddc, we changed to set .defaultValue before .value on updates. In some cases, setting .defaultValue causes .value to change, and since we only set .value if it has the wrong value, this resulted in us not assigning to .value, which resulted in inputValueTracking not knowing the right value. See new test added. My fix here is to (a) move the value setting back up first and (b) narrowing the fix in the aforementioned PR to newly remove the value attribute only if it defaultValue was previously present in props. The second half is necessary because for types where the value property and attribute are indelibly linked (hidden checkbox radio submit image reset button, i.e. spec modes default or default/on from https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/input.html#dom-input-value-default), we can't remove the value attribute after setting .value, because that will undo the assignment we just did! That is, not having (b) makes all of those types fail to handle updating props.value. This code is incredibly hard to think about but I think this is right (or at least, as right as the old code was) because we set .value here only if the nextProps.value != null, and we now remove defaultValue only if lastProps.defaultValue != null. These can't happen at the same time because we have long warned if value and defaultValue are simultaneously specified, and also if a component switches between controlled and uncontrolled. Also, it fixes the test in facebook#26626.
In 2019ddc, we changed to set .defaultValue before .value on updates. In some cases, setting .defaultValue causes .value to change, and since we only set .value if it has the wrong value, this resulted in us not assigning to .value, which resulted in inputValueTracking not knowing the right value. See new test added. My fix here is to (a) move the value setting back up first and (b) narrowing the fix in the aforementioned PR to newly remove the value attribute only if it defaultValue was previously present in props. The second half is necessary because for types where the value property and attribute are indelibly linked (hidden checkbox radio submit image reset button, i.e. spec modes default or default/on from https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/input.html#dom-input-value-default), we can't remove the value attribute after setting .value, because that will undo the assignment we just did! That is, not having (b) makes all of those types fail to handle updating props.value. This code is incredibly hard to think about but I think this is right (or at least, as right as the old code was) because we set .value here only if the nextProps.value != null, and we now remove defaultValue only if lastProps.defaultValue != null. These can't happen at the same time because we have long warned if value and defaultValue are simultaneously specified, and also if a component switches between controlled and uncontrolled. Also, it fixes the test in #26626. DiffTrain build for [b433c37](b433c37)
, facebook#26595, facebook#26596, facebook#26627 - Refactor some controlled component stuff (facebook#26573) - Don't update textarea defaultValue and input checked unnecessarily (facebook#26580) - Diff properties in the commit phase instead of generating an update payload (facebook#26583) - Move validation of text nesting into ReactDOMComponent (facebook#26594) - Remove initOption special case (facebook#26595) - Use already extracted values instead of reading off props for controlled components (facebook#26596) - Fix input tracking bug (facebook#26627)
- Refactor some controlled component stuff (#26573) - Don't update textarea defaultValue and input checked unnecessarily (#26580) - Diff properties in the commit phase instead of generating an update payload (#26583) - Move validation of text nesting into ReactDOMComponent (#26594) - Remove initOption special case (#26595) - Use already extracted values instead of reading off props for controlled components (#26596) - Fix input tracking bug (#26627) DiffTrain build for [ded4a78](ded4a78)
- Refactor some controlled component stuff (#26573) - Don't update textarea defaultValue and input checked unnecessarily (#26580) - Diff properties in the commit phase instead of generating an update payload (#26583) - Move validation of text nesting into ReactDOMComponent (#26594) - Remove initOption special case (#26595) - Use already extracted values instead of reading off props for controlled components (#26596) - Fix input tracking bug (#26627)
In facebook@2019ddc, we changed to set .defaultValue before .value on updates. In some cases, setting .defaultValue causes .value to change, and since we only set .value if it has the wrong value, this resulted in us not assigning to .value, which resulted in inputValueTracking not knowing the right value. See new test added. My fix here is to (a) move the value setting back up first and (b) narrowing the fix in the aforementioned PR to newly remove the value attribute only if it defaultValue was previously present in props. The second half is necessary because for types where the value property and attribute are indelibly linked (hidden checkbox radio submit image reset button, i.e. spec modes default or default/on from https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/input.html#dom-input-value-default), we can't remove the value attribute after setting .value, because that will undo the assignment we just did! That is, not having (b) makes all of those types fail to handle updating props.value. This code is incredibly hard to think about but I think this is right (or at least, as right as the old code was) because we set .value here only if the nextProps.value != null, and we now remove defaultValue only if lastProps.defaultValue != null. These can't happen at the same time because we have long warned if value and defaultValue are simultaneously specified, and also if a component switches between controlled and uncontrolled. Also, it fixes the test in facebook#26626.
In 2019ddc, we changed to set .defaultValue before .value on updates. In some cases, setting .defaultValue causes .value to change, and since we only set .value if it has the wrong value, this resulted in us not assigning to .value, which resulted in inputValueTracking not knowing the right value. See new test added. My fix here is to (a) move the value setting back up first and (b) narrowing the fix in the aforementioned PR to newly remove the value attribute only if it defaultValue was previously present in props. The second half is necessary because for types where the value property and attribute are indelibly linked (hidden checkbox radio submit image reset button, i.e. spec modes default or default/on from https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/input.html#dom-input-value-default), we can't remove the value attribute after setting .value, because that will undo the assignment we just did! That is, not having (b) makes all of those types fail to handle updating props.value. This code is incredibly hard to think about but I think this is right (or at least, as right as the old code was) because we set .value here only if the nextProps.value != null, and we now remove defaultValue only if lastProps.defaultValue != null. These can't happen at the same time because we have long warned if value and defaultValue are simultaneously specified, and also if a component switches between controlled and uncontrolled. Also, it fixes the test in #26626. DiffTrain build for commit b433c37.
In 2019ddc, we changed to set .defaultValue before .value on updates. In some cases, setting .defaultValue causes .value to change, and since we only set .value if it has the wrong value, this resulted in us not assigning to .value, which resulted in inputValueTracking not knowing the right value. See new test added.
My fix here is to (a) move the value setting back up first and (b) narrowing the fix in the aforementioned PR to newly remove the value attribute only if it defaultValue was previously present in props.
The second half is necessary because for types where the value property and attribute are indelibly linked (hidden checkbox radio submit image reset button, i.e. spec modes default or default/on from https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/input.html#dom-input-value-default), we can't remove the value attribute after setting .value, because that will undo the assignment we just did! That is, not having (b) makes all of those types fail to handle updating props.value.
This code is incredibly hard to think about but I think this is right (or at least, as right as the old code was) because we set .value here only if the nextProps.value != null, and we now remove defaultValue only if lastProps.defaultValue != null. These can't happen at the same time because we have long warned if value and defaultValue are simultaneously specified, and also if a component switches between controlled and uncontrolled.
Also, it fixes the test in #26626.