-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add "Why React" #48
Merged
Merged
Add "Why React" #48
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ | ||
--- | ||
title: Why should you care about React? | ||
layout: post | ||
author: petehunt | ||
--- | ||
|
||
There are a lot of JavaScript MVC frameworks out there. Why did we | ||
build React, and why would you want to use it? | ||
|
||
## React is not an MVC framework. | ||
|
||
It's a library designed for building big UIs. The type where you have | ||
lots of reusable components that are handling events, presenting | ||
backend data, and accepting user input. The type where you have to | ||
integrate with legacy code, and support legacy browsers. | ||
|
||
In a conventional MVC application, you'd build the View with React | ||
(and maybe the Controller too, if you'd like). | ||
|
||
## React doesn't use templates. | ||
|
||
Traditionally, you'd create a set of templates with a template | ||
language or HTML directives to make a page dynamic. It's up to the | ||
designer of the template language or the author of the directives to | ||
provide the full set of abstractions you can use to build your | ||
front-end code. | ||
|
||
React's technique is to break your view down into small, composable | ||
and reusable **components**. These components provide a `render()` | ||
method which specifies how the component will generate its | ||
markup. `render()` can either return normal DOM elements (like | ||
`<div>`s) or can return other components. | ||
|
||
This means that yes, we have JavaScript generating markup. But we | ||
think that this is an advantage over using templates for a few | ||
reasons: | ||
|
||
- **JavaScript is a flexible, powerful programming language with the | ||
ability to build abstractions.** This is incredibly important in | ||
large applications. | ||
- "Logic" and "markup" are intimately tied, and are both part of the | ||
"presentation" layer, so we're unifying the presentation layer, | ||
not breaking separation of concerns. | ||
- Large projects usually don't use WYSIWYG editors for production | ||
code, so breaking apart markup from the code that creates it usually | ||
only introduces friction. | ||
- We've built a safe, convenient and fast way to compose markup and | ||
components using pure JavaScript. This means **no manual string | ||
concatenation** and limited surface area for XSS vulnerabilities. | ||
|
||
## Reacting to changes | ||
|
||
React really shines when your data changes over time. | ||
|
||
In a traditional JavaScript application you need to look at what data | ||
changed and imperatively make changes to the DOM to make them | ||
consistent. Even AngularJS, which provides a declarative interface via | ||
directives and data binding, still requires a linking function to | ||
manually update DOM nodes (remember: React components are quite | ||
flexible and analogous to AngularJS directives, not templates. In big | ||
apps you'll almost certainly need this level of expressive power). | ||
|
||
React takes a different approach. | ||
|
||
When your component is first initialized, the `render()` method is | ||
called and a string of static HTML is inserted into the DOM. When your | ||
data changes, the `render()` method is called again. We diff the old | ||
return value from `render()` with the new one and determine the | ||
fastest way to update the DOM. So if only a single attribute on a | ||
single node has changed, that's all that React will update. | ||
|
||
We call this process **reconciliation**. Check out | ||
[this jsFiddle](http://jsfiddle.net/fv6RD/3/) for an example of | ||
reconciliation in action. | ||
|
||
Usually reconciliation will be faster than handwritten code, as React | ||
knows about the entire state of the page and can do cool tricks like | ||
batching reads and writes and picking the fastest subset of DOM | ||
mutations to perform. | ||
|
||
The way we're able to pull this off is by constructing a very fast, | ||
lightweight representation of the DOM which knows which parts are | ||
dirtied and which parts are clean. That is, **the data returned from | ||
`render()` isn't a string and isn't a real DOM node, it's just a | ||
lightweight description of what the DOM should look like**. | ||
|
||
Because this re-render is so fast (on the order of 1ms for TodoMVC), | ||
we don't need the end user to explicitly specify data bindings. We've | ||
found that this is an easy way to build apps. It's a lot like the | ||
early days of the dynamic web. Back then you wrote simple | ||
presentational code and when your data changed you simply refreshed | ||
the page. Today, React makes that "refresh" very fast and lightweight, | ||
and only changes the parts of the markup that need to be changed. | ||
|
||
No other framework we've seen can support this easily, since it would | ||
have to be built from the ground up to have very little coupling with | ||
the DOM. | ||
|
||
## Not just for HTML components in the browser | ||
|
||
Since React makes so few assumptions about its environment, we can do | ||
some pretty cool things with it: | ||
|
||
- Facebook.com has dynamic charts that render to `<canvas>` instead of | ||
HTML | ||
- Instagram is a "single page" web app built entirely with React and | ||
`Backbone.Router`. Designers regularly contribute React code with | ||
JSX. | ||
- We've built an internal prototype that runs React apps in a web | ||
worker | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. "You can render React components on the server..." There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. See the next line |
||
- You can run React | ||
[on the server](http://github.com/petehunt/react-server-rendering) | ||
for SEO, performance, code sharing and overall flexibility. | ||
- Events behave in a consistent, standards-compliant way in all | ||
browsers (including IE8) and automatically use | ||
[event delegation](http://davidwalsh.name/event-delegate) | ||
|
||
Head on over to | ||
[facebook.github.io/react](http://facebook.github.io/react) to check | ||
out what we've built. Our documentation is geared towards building | ||
apps with the framework, but if you're interested in the | ||
nuts-and-bolts | ||
[get in touch](http://facebook.github.io/react/support.html) with us! | ||
|
||
Thanks for reading! |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like most people won't make the connection between WYSIWYG editors and splitting markup from code. I think something like:
is a bit closer to what I'd like (meh, I still hate the wording though - def. feel free to edit).
Also, fwiw, Marshall's original comment is here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like it, but I wish we could condense that down to a single bullet since this isn't our main point. Feel free to send a PR.