Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add component stack info to key validation warnings #6799

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
May 20, 2016
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions src/isomorphic/classic/element/ReactElementValidator.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -72,10 +72,11 @@ function validateExplicitKey(element, parentType) {
warning(
false,
'Each child in an array or iterator should have a unique "key" prop.' +
'%s%s%s',
'%s%s%s%s',
addenda.parentOrOwner || '',
addenda.childOwner || '',
addenda.url || ''
addenda.url || '',
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We shouldn't need these other addenda now since the stack should cover it. Can you remove the code for them? We still will want to dedupe the warnings based on owner though as we're currently doing.

ReactComponentTreeDevtool.getCurrentStackAddendum(element)
);
}

Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -19,6 +19,10 @@ var ReactDOM;
var ReactTestUtils;

describe('ReactElementValidator', function() {
function normalizeCodeLocInfo(str) {
return str.replace(/\(at .+?:\d+\)/g, '(at **)');
}

var ComponentClass;

beforeEach(function() {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -95,9 +99,10 @@ describe('ReactElementValidator', function() {
ReactTestUtils.renderIntoDocument(<Anonymous>{divs}</Anonymous>);

expect(console.error.argsForCall.length).toBe(1);
expect(console.error.argsForCall[0][0]).toBe(
expect(normalizeCodeLocInfo(console.error.argsForCall[0][0])).toBe(
'Warning: Each child in an array or iterator should have a unique ' +
'"key" prop. See https://fb.me/react-warning-keys for more information.'
'"key" prop. See https://fb.me/react-warning-keys for more information.\n' +
' in div (at **)'
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be nice if this had both the parent component (Anonymous, or "Unknown" as we'll know it as in the devtools) and the child (div) here. Is that possible? I guess we would probably have to make getCurrentStackAddendum take both elements as arguments.

);
});

Expand All @@ -111,10 +116,46 @@ describe('ReactElementValidator', function() {
ReactTestUtils.renderIntoDocument(<div>{divs}</div>);

expect(console.error.argsForCall.length).toBe(1);
expect(console.error.argsForCall[0][0]).toBe(
expect(normalizeCodeLocInfo(console.error.argsForCall[0][0])).toBe(
'Warning: Each child in an array or iterator should have a unique ' +
'"key" prop. Check the top-level render call using <div>. See ' +
'https://fb.me/react-warning-keys for more information.'
'https://fb.me/react-warning-keys for more information.\n' +
' in div (at **)'
);
});

it('warns for keys with component stack info', function() {
spyOn(console, 'error');

var Component = React.createClass({
render: function() {
return <div>{[<div />, <div />]}</div>;
},
});

var Parent = React.createClass({
render: function() {
return React.cloneElement(this.props.child);
},
});

var GrandParent = React.createClass({
render: function() {
return <Parent child={<Component />} />;
},
});

ReactTestUtils.renderIntoDocument(<GrandParent />);

expect(console.error.argsForCall.length).toBe(1);
expect(normalizeCodeLocInfo(console.error.argsForCall[0][0])).toBe(
'Warning: Each child in an array or iterator should have a unique ' +
'"key" prop. Check the render method of `Component`. See ' +
'https://fb.me/react-warning-keys for more information.\n' +
' in div (at **)\n' +
' in Component (at **)\n' +
' in Parent (at **)\n' +
' in GrandParent (at **)'
);
});

Expand Down
52 changes: 29 additions & 23 deletions src/isomorphic/devtools/ReactComponentTreeDevtool.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -48,6 +48,28 @@ function purgeDeep(id) {
}
}

function describeComponentFrame(name, source, ownerName) {
return '\n in ' + name + (
source ?
' (at ' + source.fileName.replace(/^.*[\\\/]/, '') + ':' +
source.lineNumber + ')' :
ownerName ?
' (created by ' + ownerName + ')' :
''
);
}

function describeID(id) {
var name = ReactComponentTreeDevtool.getDisplayName(id);
var element = ReactComponentTreeDevtool.getElement(id);
var ownerID = ReactComponentTreeDevtool.getOwnerID(id);
var ownerName;
if (ownerID) {
ownerName = ReactComponentTreeDevtool.getDisplayName(ownerID);
}
return describeComponentFrame(name, element._source, ownerName);
}

var ReactComponentTreeDevtool = {
onSetDisplayName(id, displayName) {
updateTree(id, item => item.displayName = displayName);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -154,28 +176,6 @@ var ReactComponentTreeDevtool = {
},

getCurrentStackAddendum(topElement) {
function describeComponentFrame(name, source, ownerName) {
return '\n in ' + name + (
source ?
' (at ' + source.fileName.replace(/^.*[\\\/]/, '') + ':' +
source.lineNumber + ')' :
ownerName ?
' (created by ' + ownerName + ')' :
''
);
}

function describeID(id) {
var name = ReactComponentTreeDevtool.getDisplayName(id);
var element = ReactComponentTreeDevtool.getElement(id);
var ownerID = ReactComponentTreeDevtool.getOwnerID(id);
var ownerName;
if (ownerID) {
ownerName = ReactComponentTreeDevtool.getDisplayName(ownerID);
}
return describeComponentFrame(name, element._source, ownerName);
}

var info = '';
if (topElement) {
var type = topElement.type;
Expand All @@ -192,11 +192,17 @@ var ReactComponentTreeDevtool = {

var currentOwner = ReactCurrentOwner.current;
var id = currentOwner && currentOwner._debugID;

info += ReactComponentTreeDevtool.getStackAddendumByID(id);
return info;
},

getStackAddendumByID(id) {
var info = '';
while (id) {
info += describeID(id);
id = ReactComponentTreeDevtool.getParentID(id);
}

return info;
},

Expand Down
31 changes: 26 additions & 5 deletions src/renderers/shared/stack/reconciler/ReactChildReconciler.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -13,22 +13,24 @@

var ReactReconciler = require('ReactReconciler');

var ReactComponentTreeDevtool = require('ReactComponentTreeDevtool');
var instantiateReactComponent = require('instantiateReactComponent');
var KeyEscapeUtils = require('KeyEscapeUtils');
var shouldUpdateReactComponent = require('shouldUpdateReactComponent');
var traverseAllChildren = require('traverseAllChildren');
var warning = require('warning');

function instantiateChild(childInstances, child, name) {
function instantiateChild(childInstances, child, name, selfDebugID) {
// We found a component instance.
var keyUnique = (childInstances[name] === undefined);
if (__DEV__) {
warning(
keyUnique,
'flattenChildren(...): Encountered two children with the same key, ' +
'`%s`. Child keys must be unique; when two children share a key, only ' +
'the first child will be used.',
KeyEscapeUtils.unescape(name)
'the first child will be used.%s',
KeyEscapeUtils.unescape(name),
ReactComponentTreeDevtool.getStackAddendumByID(selfDebugID)
);
}
if (child != null && keyUnique) {
Expand All @@ -50,12 +52,31 @@ var ReactChildReconciler = {
* @return {?object} A set of child instances.
* @internal
*/
instantiateChildren: function(nestedChildNodes, transaction, context) {
instantiateChildren: function(
nestedChildNodes,
transaction,
context,
selfDebugID // __DEV__ only
) {
if (nestedChildNodes == null) {
return null;
}
var childInstances = {};
traverseAllChildren(nestedChildNodes, instantiateChild, childInstances);

if (__DEV__) {
traverseAllChildren(
nestedChildNodes,
(childInsts, child, name) => instantiateChild(
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried to put selfDebugID as the first arg of instantiateChild and to use instantiateChild.bind(null, selfDebugID) here, but that means we need to call bind as well in the production build. Do you think the current approach (arrowed currying, if that's a term) is acceptable? @spicyj

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, this seems fine to me. (I think calling it parentDebugID might be a little clearer, but this is also oaky.)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, I thought about this; self is more clear to me since we are talking about the current component which happens to be the parent for the children here.

childInsts,
child,
name,
selfDebugID
),
childInstances
);
} else {
traverseAllChildren(nestedChildNodes, instantiateChild, childInstances);
}
return childInstances;
},

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/renderers/shared/stack/reconciler/ReactMultiChild.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ var ReactMultiChild = {
try {
ReactCurrentOwner.current = this._currentElement._owner;
return ReactChildReconciler.instantiateChildren(
nestedChildren, transaction, context
nestedChildren, transaction, context, this._debugID
);
} finally {
ReactCurrentOwner.current = null;
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
/**
* Copyright 2013-present, Facebook, Inc.
* All rights reserved.
*
* This source code is licensed under the BSD-style license found in the
* LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree. An additional grant
* of patent rights can be found in the PATENTS file in the same directory.
*
* @emails react-core
*/

// NOTE: We're explicitly not using JSX here. This is intended to test
// the current stack addendum without having source location added by babel.

'use strict';

var React;
var ReactTestUtils;

describe('ReactChildReconciler', function() {
beforeEach(function() {
jest.resetModuleRegistry();

React = require('React');
ReactTestUtils = require('ReactTestUtils');
});

it('warns for duplicated keys', function() {
spyOn(console, 'error');

var Component = React.createClass({
render() {
// <div>{[<div key="1" />, <div key="1" />]}</div>
return React.createElement('div', null, [
React.createElement('div', { key: '1' }),
React.createElement('div', { key: '1' }),
]);
},
});

ReactTestUtils.renderIntoDocument(<Component />);

expect(console.error.argsForCall.length).toBe(1);
expect(console.error.argsForCall[0][0]).toContain(
'Child keys must be unique; when two children share a key, only the first child will be used.'
);
});

it('warns for duplicated keys with component stack info', function() {
spyOn(console, 'error');

var Component = React.createClass({
render: function() {
// <div>{[<div key="1" />, <div key="1" />]}</div>
return React.createElement('div', null, [
React.createElement('div', { key: '1' }),
React.createElement('div', { key: '1' }),
]);
},
});

var Parent = React.createClass({
render: function() {
return React.cloneElement(this.props.child);
},
});

var GrandParent = React.createClass({
render: function() {
// <Parent child={<Component />} />
return React.createElement(Parent, {
child: React.createElement(Component),
});
},
});

ReactTestUtils.renderIntoDocument(React.createElement(GrandParent));

expect(console.error.argsForCall.length).toBe(1);
expect(console.error.argsForCall[0][0]).toBe(
'Warning: flattenChildren(...): ' +
'Encountered two children with the same key, `1`. ' +
'Child keys must be unique; when two children share a key, ' +
'only the first child will be used.\n' +
' in div (created by Component)\n' +
' in Component (created by GrandParent)\n' +
' in Parent (created by GrandParent)\n' +
' in GrandParent'
);
});
});
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,8 +12,11 @@
'use strict';

describe('ReactMultiChild', function() {
var React;
function normalizeCodeLocInfo(str) {
return str.replace(/\(at .+?:\d+\)/g, '(at **)');
}

var React;
var ReactDOM;

beforeEach(function() {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -148,5 +151,51 @@ describe('ReactMultiChild', function() {
expect(mockMount.mock.calls.length).toBe(2);
expect(mockUnmount.mock.calls.length).toBe(1);
});

it('should warn for duplicated keys with component stack info', function() {
spyOn(console, 'error');

var container = document.createElement('div');

var WrapperComponent = React.createClass({
render: function() {
return <div>{this.props.children}</div>;
},
});

var Parent = React.createClass({
render: function() {
return (
<div>
<WrapperComponent>
{this.props.children}
</WrapperComponent>
</div>
);
},
});

ReactDOM.render(
<Parent>{[<div key="1"/>]}</Parent>,
container
);

ReactDOM.render(
<Parent>{[<div key="1"/>, <div key="1"/>]}</Parent>,
container
);

expect(console.error.argsForCall.length).toBe(1);
expect(normalizeCodeLocInfo(console.error.argsForCall[0][0])).toBe(
'Warning: flattenChildren(...): ' +
'Encountered two children with the same key, `1`. ' +
'Child keys must be unique; when two children share a key, ' +
'only the first child will be used.\n' +
' in div (at **)\n' +
' in WrapperComponent (at **)\n' +
' in div (at **)\n' +
' in Parent (at **)'
);
});
});
});
Loading