-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 165
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(ci): fix shared-libs and emscripten CI #2203
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Andrea Terzolo <andreaterzolo3@gmail.com>
During the weekend, runner images ubuntu-24.04 got updates and a couple of jobs are now failing. |
/milestone 0.20.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 6099b2bb1f72523b330d2aa8959b5d287837364b
|
Perf diff from master - unit tests
Heap diff from master - unit tests
Heap diff from master - scap file
Benchmarks diff from master
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Andreagit97, FedeDP The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2203 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 75.19% 75.19%
=======================================
Files 261 261
Lines 33878 33878
Branches 5801 5801
=======================================
Hits 25475 25475
Misses 8403 8403
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind failing-test
Any specific area of the project related to this PR?
/area CI
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: