-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 998
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Kafka source #22
Comments
I also feel that the deserializer classes should be either inner classes or in a separate package with the feature row kafka IO class. As they are very kafka specific. But we can just move them when we get around to modularizing all the source classes. |
I think i accidentally removed the IOException import when I did the merge for PR #12, sorry :( |
I'm fixing it, pull request incoming |
@baskaranz can you take a look at this. Also, can you please use the google-java-format plugin if you're using intellij, we standardised on that. |
I think we should also write an integration test before we close this issue. |
I agree. Not having an integration test is part of the challenge. We merge based on trust that all relevant testing was done. Integration tests would remove that problem. |
@baskaranz can you take on making unit test for the FeatureRowKafkaIO? |
Tim, I can take it.
Thanks,
Baskaran
…On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 1:23 PM Tim Sell ***@***.***> wrote:
@baskaranz <https://github.com/baskaranz> can you take on making unit
test for the FeatureRowKafkaIO?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#22 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGBq42gmBuqhwQGKK86rKMX2evO7iXAaks5u_ZO3gaJpZM4ZlMXh>
.
|
@baskaranz any updates on this issue? As discussed in #13. Can you also remove the FeatureRowKey proto message? We don't actually care what the key is, as everything is in the message, so we don't need it when reading. That's a concern for the publisher. |
One more bug that I'd like to tag to this issue: On the core side, the import spec validation prevents the submission of kafka jobs. |
@tims @baskaranz @zhilingc, what is the current status of this issue, are we still pending the following?
|
@woop apart from |
Closes KE-654 Added third data science scenario, ingestion of data for fraud detection.
docstrings for permissions package
The kafka IO PR #19 needs some follow ups.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: