Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve support for yokogawa (and possible future OPM systems) #819

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

contsili
Copy link
Contributor

@contsili contsili commented Nov 4, 2024

ft_sensorrealign is obsolete. ft_electrorealign can be used instead.

However, cfg.method = 'fiducial' can be used only for elec structures and not for grad structures. So instead we use cfg.method = 'template'.

ft_sensorrealign is obsolete. ft_electrorealign can be used instead. 

However, cfg.method = 'fiducial' can be used only for elec structures and not for grad structures. So instead we use cfg.method = 'template'.
@contsili
Copy link
Contributor Author

contsili commented Nov 5, 2024

Hi @robertoostenveld @schoffelen,

In my Yokogawa dataset, using cfg.method = 'template' to align polhemus and sensors based on three fiducials didn't perform well. For >3 fiducials it seems to work better; see FT coreg tutorial.

To align Polhemus data with Yokogawa sensors (+ newer OPM systems will benefit from that!), I suggest we expand ft_electroderealign to allow for cfg.method = 'fiducial'to be used also for grad structures, or revive ft_sensorrealign or create a new function ft_gradrealign

@contsili
Copy link
Contributor Author

contsili commented Nov 5, 2024

OPMs have the flexibility to be on the scalp as EEG, so many EEG methods can be extended to the OPMs e.g., via the ft_gradrealign. For example I needed to use the cfg.method = 'moveinward' for my thesis and there was no FT code to that for grad but only for elec. So I wrote my own code in the end.

@contsili contsili changed the title Update yokogawa.md Improve support for yokogawa (and possible future OPM systems) Nov 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant