add signatures to blocks #159
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
magik6k
approved these changes
Aug 27, 2019
|
SGWM, any concrete reason for using uint64 instead of |
|
Mostly because its easier to reason about serialization, i don't have to customize the marshaling of the time.Time object to do the right thing |
nonsense
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2020
dumikau
pushed a commit
to protofire/lotus
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 8, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Also added timestamps to the data structures, but not to validation yet. Still waiting on some specs stuff to land there.