Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: market: set all index provider options based on lotus config #8444

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2022

Conversation

masih
Copy link
Member

@masih masih commented Apr 6, 2022

Related Issues

N/A

Proposed Changes

Hook up the missing lotus-specific index provider config with engine options. Looks like the engine was missing some options populated from the corresponding lotus config.

Additional Info

N/A

Checklist

Before you mark the PR ready for review, please make sure that:

  • All commits have a clear commit message.
  • The PR title is in the form of of <PR type>: <area>: <change being made>
    • example: fix: mempool: Introduce a cache for valid signatures
    • PR type: fix, feat, INTERFACE BREAKING CHANGE, CONSENSUS BREAKING, build, chore, ci, docs,perf, refactor, revert, style, test
    • area: api, chain, state, vm, data transfer, market, mempool, message, block production, multisig, networking, paychan, proving, sealing, wallet, deps
  • This PR has tests for new functionality or change in behaviour
  • If new user-facing features are introduced, clear usage guidelines and / or documentation updates should be included in https://lotus.filecoin.io or Discussion Tutorials.
  • CI is green

Always set index provider options based on the lotus configuration.
Otherwise, they will have no effect.
@masih masih requested a review from a team as a code owner April 6, 2022 15:13
@magik6k magik6k merged commit f378c6d into master Apr 6, 2022
@magik6k magik6k deleted the masih/fix-idxprov-config branch April 6, 2022 15:59
jennijuju added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants