chore(analytics): add Scarf to npm install, docs, and ui

[aviaviavi]

As discussed with @JamieSlome directly, this PR adds basic usage tracking tooling with Scarf, compliant with CNCF guidelines.

There are a few code-level modifications in this PR:

• Basic metrics for npm installs
• Adding a Scarf pixel to the documentation
• Adding a Scarf pixel to the footer of the UI, for basic metrics of when the UI is loaded for the first time.

As with all Scarf-based tracking, these metrics are fully anonymized and GDPR-compliant. No PII is being retained or exposed from this change.

I have the organization for git-proxy set up in Scarf, @JamieSlome as soon as you make an account I can transfer org ownership to you, and you'll be able to add any and all project maintainers.

[linux-foundation-easycla]

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: aviaviavi / name: Avi Press (6717ab2, 23e7de5, f12e619, 36ba72b)
• ✅ login: JamieSlome / name: Jamie Slome (f0454f5)

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for endearing-brigadeiros-63f9d0 ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	23e7de5
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/endearing-brigadeiros-63f9d0/deploys/671d3098940a6c0008f1e26f
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-725--endearing-brigadeiros-63f9d0.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[JamieSlome]

@aviaviavi - thanks for the PR ❤️

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 57.34%. Comparing base (c84c100) to head (f0454f5).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #725   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   57.34%   57.34%           
=======================================
  Files          46       46           
  Lines        1594     1594           
=======================================
  Hits          914      914           
  Misses        680      680           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[JamieSlome]

@aviaviavi - are you able to resolve the merge conflict? Apologies!

[JamieSlome]

@maoo - would be keen to get your thoughts here before we merge 👍

[aviaviavi]

conflicts resolved!

[aviaviavi]

@JamieSlome let me know if I can answer any questions here!

[eddie-knight]

Hey @aviaviavi, could you email me any relevant documentation or agreements regarding how the data gathered by Scarf will be handled? I'll bring that to the TOC to propose approval for FINOS project adoption.

[aviaviavi]

After some IRL discussions with @JamieSlome today:

There are many other LF projects working with Scarf already through our partnership with the LF, so there is significant precedent here for FINOS to greenlight this too. To name just a few:

• falco
• fluent-bit
• linkerd
• cert-manager
• SPIFFE / SPIRE
• Kyverno
• Flyte
• Dapr
• LitmusChaos
• Janssen

These projects across categories like cloud native, security, data, etc, and spans the LF, CNCF, LF AI, and more.

If there are remaining concerns at the FINOS level, I would be happy to discuss them either directly or here. I sense there may be remaining misunderstandings about the data collection being proposed here and what the risks of concern actually are, but the goal here is to help the maintainers of git-proxy have a better understanding of project adoption in a way that does not compromise privacy or compliance posture.

[eddie-knight]

Thanks Avi!

@JamieSlome could you help capture this as part of finos/technical-oversight-committee#158