feat: Test updater library #700
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mkilchhofer
force-pushed
the
feature/testing_updater_library
branch
from
53cf353
to
421a521
Compare
pothos
reviewed
Dec 18, 2023
pothos
reviewed
Dec 18, 2023
mkilchhofer
force-pushed
the
feature/testing_updater_library
branch
from
421a521
to
556924f
Compare
pothos
approved these changes
Jan 2, 2024
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I observed that the PRs for
/updaterwere not automatically tested with GH actions. Updater library was introduced here by @joaquimrocha :How to use
nothing special
Testing done
Merged this PR on my forks
mainbranch and filed a PR with one of the open PRs here:Action output: https://github.com/mkilchhofer/nebraska/actions/runs/7380534949/job/20078013657?pr=27