This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 16, 2020. It is now read-only.
Document the current bash requirement #24
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
It won't - when a ticket would be closed, Github now adds a dotted line under the text responsible & a tooltip explaining what will happen. It's slick :) |
kofalt
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2017
|
Question @ehlertjd - was there a pull request comment template? There's supposed to be one. I dislike the things personally, but it's nice for this one to remind us when to bump the spec version. |
|
@kofalt Yeah, just dropped it back into the original comment |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added an explicit clarification of the minimum container requirements for the current version of the spec. Ultimately we'd like to look into removing the bash requirement in a future version.
Is this a semantic or operational change? NO If so:
Refs #21
@kofalt @gsfr