Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Rollup merge of rust-lang#124844 - compiler-errors:shadow-probe, r=lcnr
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Use a proper probe for shadowing impl

r? lcnr
  • Loading branch information
fmease authored May 13, 2024
2 parents 176741b + b39ef8b commit 3ea4fdf
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 5 changed files with 38 additions and 21 deletions.
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions compiler/rustc_middle/src/traits/solve/inspect.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -153,6 +153,8 @@ pub enum ProbeKind<'tcx> {
/// do a probe to find out what projection type(s) may be used to prove that
/// the source type upholds all of the target type's object bounds.
UpcastProjectionCompatibility,
/// Looking for param-env candidates that satisfy the trait ref for a projection.
ShadowedEnvProbing,
/// Try to unify an opaque type with an existing key in the storage.
OpaqueTypeStorageLookup { result: QueryResult<'tcx> },
}
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions compiler/rustc_middle/src/traits/solve/inspect/format.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -118,6 +118,9 @@ impl<'a, 'b> ProofTreeFormatter<'a, 'b> {
ProbeKind::TraitCandidate { source, result } => {
write!(self.f, "CANDIDATE {source:?}: {result:?}")
}
ProbeKind::ShadowedEnvProbing => {
write!(self.f, "PROBING FOR IMPLS SHADOWED BY PARAM-ENV CANDIDATE:")
}
}?;

self.nested(|this| {
Expand Down
19 changes: 8 additions & 11 deletions compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/assembly/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
//! Code shared by trait and projection goals for candidate assembly.

use crate::solve::GoalSource;
use crate::solve::{inspect, EvalCtxt, SolverMode};
use crate::solve::{EvalCtxt, SolverMode};
use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
use rustc_infer::traits::query::NoSolution;
use rustc_middle::bug;
Expand All @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ use rustc_middle::ty::{fast_reject, TypeFoldable};
use rustc_middle::ty::{ToPredicate, TypeVisitableExt};
use rustc_span::{ErrorGuaranteed, DUMMY_SP};
use std::fmt::Debug;
use std::mem;

pub(super) mod structural_traits;

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -792,17 +791,16 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
goal: Goal<'tcx, G>,
candidates: &mut Vec<Candidate<'tcx>>,
) {
// HACK: We temporarily remove the `ProofTreeBuilder` to
// avoid adding `Trait` candidates to the candidates used
// to prove the current goal.
let inspect = mem::replace(&mut self.inspect, inspect::ProofTreeBuilder::new_noop());

let tcx = self.tcx();
let trait_goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::TraitPredicate<'tcx>> =
goal.with(tcx, goal.predicate.trait_ref(tcx));
let mut trait_candidates_from_env = Vec::new();
self.assemble_param_env_candidates(trait_goal, &mut trait_candidates_from_env);
self.assemble_alias_bound_candidates(trait_goal, &mut trait_candidates_from_env);

let mut trait_candidates_from_env = vec![];
self.probe(|_| ProbeKind::ShadowedEnvProbing).enter(|ecx| {
ecx.assemble_param_env_candidates(trait_goal, &mut trait_candidates_from_env);
ecx.assemble_alias_bound_candidates(trait_goal, &mut trait_candidates_from_env);
});

if !trait_candidates_from_env.is_empty() {
let trait_env_result = self.merge_candidates(trait_candidates_from_env);
match trait_env_result.unwrap().value.certainty {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -831,7 +829,6 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
}
}
}
self.inspect = inspect;
}

/// If there are multiple ways to prove a trait or projection goal, we have
Expand Down
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/eval_ctxt/select.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -176,7 +176,8 @@ fn to_selection<'tcx>(
| ProbeKind::UnsizeAssembly
| ProbeKind::UpcastProjectionCompatibility
| ProbeKind::OpaqueTypeStorageLookup { result: _ }
| ProbeKind::Root { result: _ } => {
| ProbeKind::Root { result: _ }
| ProbeKind::ShadowedEnvProbing => {
span_bug!(span, "didn't expect to assemble trait candidate from {:#?}", cand.kind())
}
})
Expand Down
32 changes: 23 additions & 9 deletions compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/inspect/analyse.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -290,12 +290,25 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> {
match *step {
inspect::ProbeStep::AddGoal(source, goal) => nested_goals.push((source, goal)),
inspect::ProbeStep::NestedProbe(ref probe) => {
// Nested probes have to prove goals added in their parent
// but do not leak them, so we truncate the added goals
// afterwards.
let num_goals = nested_goals.len();
self.candidates_recur(candidates, nested_goals, probe);
nested_goals.truncate(num_goals);
match probe.kind {
// These never assemble candidates for the goal we're trying to solve.
inspect::ProbeKind::UpcastProjectionCompatibility
| inspect::ProbeKind::ShadowedEnvProbing => continue,

inspect::ProbeKind::NormalizedSelfTyAssembly
| inspect::ProbeKind::UnsizeAssembly
| inspect::ProbeKind::Root { .. }
| inspect::ProbeKind::TryNormalizeNonRigid { .. }
| inspect::ProbeKind::TraitCandidate { .. }
| inspect::ProbeKind::OpaqueTypeStorageLookup { .. } => {
// Nested probes have to prove goals added in their parent
// but do not leak them, so we truncate the added goals
// afterwards.
let num_goals = nested_goals.len();
self.candidates_recur(candidates, nested_goals, probe);
nested_goals.truncate(num_goals);
}
}
}
inspect::ProbeStep::MakeCanonicalResponse { shallow_certainty: c } => {
assert_eq!(shallow_certainty.replace(c), None);
Expand All @@ -308,9 +321,10 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> {
}

match probe.kind {
inspect::ProbeKind::NormalizedSelfTyAssembly
| inspect::ProbeKind::UnsizeAssembly
| inspect::ProbeKind::UpcastProjectionCompatibility => (),
inspect::ProbeKind::UpcastProjectionCompatibility
| inspect::ProbeKind::ShadowedEnvProbing => bug!(),

inspect::ProbeKind::NormalizedSelfTyAssembly | inspect::ProbeKind::UnsizeAssembly => {}

// We add a candidate even for the root evaluation if there
// is only one way to prove a given goal, e.g. for `WellFormed`.
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 3ea4fdf

Please sign in to comment.