Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🛠 Add basic array safety functions and backwards-compatible result type #3805
🛠 Add basic array safety functions and backwards-compatible result type #3805
Changes from 2 commits
acc60e6
c2488d1
45595fd
90b6cdf
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need all three overloads and why?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could make a
const
-only version of this function that just unconditionally returns a copy. It'd be cheap for all the cases we care about, but if later functionality is added to do e.g. realoutput_range
that has a move-only iterator, then it'll start being a compilation break to use this type.There is also the case that for real
output_range
types, you'd want to return astd::ranges::subrange
or a sufficient mockup of one, so it might be worth it to invest in making a realfmt::detail::subrange
for the return value.