Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

MODINV-986: InstanceIngress events consumption #716

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 31, 2024
Merged

MODINV-986: InstanceIngress events consumption #716

merged 4 commits into from
May 31, 2024

Conversation

PBobylev
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@PBobylev PBobylev self-assigned this Apr 22, 2024
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Apr 22, 2024 •
edited
Loading

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@PBobylev PBobylev force-pushed the MODINV-986_step_1 branch 2 times, most recently from f343f47 to 6dbaabf Compare April 22, 2024 11:55
@sonarcloud SonarCloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Apr 24, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
2 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

JavokhirAbdullayev
JavokhirAbdullayev reviewed May 13, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@JavokhirAbdullayev JavokhirAbdullayev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please update news md file with a link to jira ticket to be able to track changes

@PBobylev
Copy link
Contributor Author

please update news md file with a link to jira ticket to be able to track changes

Sure, thank you for the notice

@PBobylev PBobylev changed the title MODINV-986: step 1: prepare InstanceIngestConsumerVerticle re-using other consumer verticles logic MODINV-986: InstanceIngress events consumption May 31, 2024
@PBobylev PBobylev merged commit cdcb39d into MODINV-986 May 31, 2024
5 of 7 checks passed
@sonarcloud SonarCloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented May 31, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
10 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@aleksei-pronichev aleksei-pronichev aleksei-pronichev left review comments

@JavokhirAbdullayev JavokhirAbdullayev JavokhirAbdullayev left review comments

@pkjacob pkjacob pkjacob approved these changes

@KaterynaSenchenko KaterynaSenchenko Awaiting requested review from KaterynaSenchenko

@askhat-abishev askhat-abishev Awaiting requested review from askhat-abishev

@Aliaksandr-Fedasiuk Aliaksandr-Fedasiuk Awaiting requested review from Aliaksandr-Fedasiuk

@dmytrokrutii dmytrokrutii Awaiting requested review from dmytrokrutii

@VRohach VRohach Awaiting requested review from VRohach

@RuslanLavrov RuslanLavrov Awaiting requested review from RuslanLavrov

@RomanChernetskyi RomanChernetskyi Awaiting requested review from RomanChernetskyi

Assignees

@PBobylev PBobylev

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@PBobylev @CLAassistant @aleksei-pronichev @JavokhirAbdullayev @pkjacob