Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make --output-format and --no-user-output mutually exclusive #979

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2024
Merged

Make --output-format and --no-user-output mutually exclusive #979

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2024

Conversation

Marcono1234
Copy link
Contributor

See #970 (reply in thread)

When used together, execution now fails, as desired:

error: the argument '--output-format <FORMAT>' cannot be used with '--no-user-output'

Usage: cargo msrv verify --output-format <FORMAT> [-- <CUSTOM_CHECK_OPTS>...]

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.13%. Comparing base (8c01c59) to head (5c48020).
Report is 18 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #979      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.09%   75.13%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          80       79       -1     
  Lines        5530     5549      +19     
==========================================
+ Hits         4153     4169      +16     
- Misses       1377     1380       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@foresterre foresterre merged commit ebccc02 into foresterre:main Aug 11, 2024
15 checks passed
@Marcono1234 Marcono1234 deleted the output-format-arg-handling branch August 11, 2024 12:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants