Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(evm): fuzzing not properly collecting data #2724
fix(evm): fuzzing not properly collecting data #2724
Changes from all commits
cbb2475
95c1f10
b95b84e
96fad72
010c417
de9c728
96c9e76
7e62839
1e0a25a
ccd9d0c
94ec119
a3301e1
d379e2f
a370232
16e072f
fffc554
a952650
6648e8c
236709e
5db4bd4
f942121
7035c3a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we want to do this? what if there's e.g. a smart contract wallet that would make a call and hit e.g. a
if isContract
check that would trigger a re-entrancy via onERC721/onERC1155 fallback?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This code only prevents adding this address to the dictionary through the
statechangeset
. The changes are still applied. So, unless I misunderstood something, it wouldn't prevent that scenario.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like weights are 90/10 but the comment above this method says 80/20. Probably should be exposed as a config option at some point (not necessarily in this PR)