add support for /tl:[auto|on|off] msbuild flag

[smoothdeveloper]

Description

see --tl:[auto|on|off] on dotnet build documentation: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-gb/dotnet/core/tools/dotnet-build

Since this only works with dotnet sdk >= 8, the default case (specifying Auto) will not emit the tag.

TODO

Feel free to open the PR and ask for help

• New (API-)documentation for new features exist (Note: API-docs are enough, additional docs are in help/markdown)

• unit or integration test exists (or short reasoning why it doesn't make sense)

  Note: Consider using the CreateProcess API which can be tested more easily, see https://github.com/fsharp/FAKE/pull/2131/files#diff-4fb4a77e110fbbe8210205dfe022389b for an example (the changes in the DotNet.Testing.NUnit module)

• boy scout rule: "leave the code behind in a better state than you found it" (fix warnings, obsolete members or code-style in the places you worked in)

• (if new module) the module has been linked from the "side navigation" menu, edit docs/data.json.

• (if new module) the module is in the correct namespace.

• (if new module) the module is added to Fake.sln (dotnet sln Fake.sln add src/app/Fake.*/Fake.*.fsproj)

• Fake API guideline is honored

[smoothdeveloper]

tried it (specificying TerminalLogger = On) in the build.fsx in this repository and it seems to work:

[smoothdeveloper]

now with <para/> tags.

[xperiandri]

Do you have any ideas why build fails?

[smoothdeveloper]

@xperiandri no, I see the same on another run on master branch: https://github.com/fsprojects/FAKE/actions/runs/7174371576/job/19535683031

We should investigate but I doubt it is related to this change.

[xperiandri]

Probably something bad with an agent. Maybe update the version of image

[xperiandri]

Could you rebase onto the latest master?

[smoothdeveloper]

@xperiandri not sure what is blocking in CI, seems an upload is timing out.

[xperiandri]

@smoothdeveloper do we need to update the release notes?
https://github.com/fsprojects/FAKE/pull/2778/files

[xperiandri]

@Thorium @Numpsy what do you think about release notes?

[Thorium]

Seems, good to me: a small addition, and there is no new dependencies or anything added. And release notes are there already updated in this PR.

[Numpsy]

Is there any manually managed documentation for features like this, or is it just generated out of the XML doc comments?

[xperiandri]

Conflict appeared