Add pureconfig for scala3 [fixes fthomas/refined#1092]

[ivan-klass]

Added ConfigReader and ConfigWriter for refined types

I've kept 2.13 signature as is in order to keep binary compatibility - I'll be happy if one can help checking if it is actually maintained.

Also, now refined ConfigReader and ConfigWriter can be obtained independently from ConfigConvert (more basic instances have lower priority when resolving).
I tend to think that ConfigWriter is used much more rarely in practice then ConfigReader. But with previous code it was impossible to get ConfigReader[T Refined P] if you only have ConfigReader[T] but no ConfigWriter[T]

[fthomas]

Thanks for the PR, @ivan-klass!

The Scala 3 build failed with:

[error] -- [E008] Not Found Error: /home/runner/work/refined/refined/modules/pureconfig/shared/src/test/scala-3.0+/eu/timepit/refined/pureconfig/SpecDerivedInstances.scala:17:36 
[error] 17 |    ConfigValueFactory.fromMap(JMap.of("value", cfg))
[error]    |                               ^^^^^^^
[error]    |                        value of is not a member of object java.util.Map

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1162 (ae47168) into master (f3546e2) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1162      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.66%   92.69%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          63       65       +2     
  Lines         832      835       +3     
  Branches       26       29       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits          771      774       +3     
  Misses         61       61              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...fined/pureconfig/TypeDescribeVersionSpecific.scala	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
.../eu/timepit/refined/pureconfig/BaseInstances.scala	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
.../scala/eu/timepit/refined/pureconfig/package.scala	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[ivan-klass]

Linking #1092 to this (I wonder why PR title doesn't work as described by docs

[fthomas]

I've kept 2.13 signature as is in order to keep binary compatibility - I'll be happy if one can help checking if it is actually maintained.

The CI checks this with MiMa. I just checked this locally again to make sure that it is compatible:

sbt:refined> pureconfigJVM/mimaPreviousArtifacts
[info] Set(eu.timepit:refined-pureconfig:0.10.0, eu.timepit:refined-pureconfig:0.10.1, eu.timepit:refined-pureconfig:0.10.2)
sbt:refined> pureconfigJVM/mimaReportBinaryIssues
[info] compiling 45 Scala sources to refined/modules/core/jvm/target/scala-2.13/classes ...
[info] compiling 3 Scala sources to refined/modules/pureconfig/jvm/target/scala-2.13/classes ...
[success] Total time: 7 s, completed Mar 12, 2023, 9:45:50 AM

Seems to be fine.

[fthomas]

Looks great. Thanks again, @ivan-klass!