Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cleanup: resolve pylint warnings #149
cleanup: resolve pylint warnings #149
Changes from all commits
c2a1d9c
f23de3d
97199fd
c127498
f658c39
87d9f5f
0870fb5
b9b5a2e
40e3722
e550e1d
e019add
3b4d229
7221aaa
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't seem right to me by the names and descriptions of these methods. Why would updating a sequence location (parent method) have anything to do with a named feature (child method)? My understanding of named features are annotated regions on a sequence, e.g. gene symbols, protein domains, named exons.
I would need to dig deeper into the code to understand if this is actually correct; and if so we need to reconsider the names and descriptions of these functions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From my understanding of this and the notebook, these methods converts a Chromsome Location or Gene Location to a Sequence Location
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@reece and @ahwagner can you review the changes to the localizer module?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@korikuzma is correct: the "localization" process is intended to convert a named feature to coordinates. I proposed (and I thought that you and Larry agreed) that we needed to be able to project all features onto a common coordinate system. This operation is necessary in order to identify overlapping features, for example.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I think I misunderstood; I thought we were "localizing" a sequence location here, but understand now the idea is to localize a feature or chromosome location. That seems appropriately named to me. Thanks @korikuzma and @reece.