Exclude the __typename field from GadgetRecord.toJSON()
#176
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
airhorns
changed the title
__typename field from GadgetRecord.toJSON()
airhorns
force-pushed
the
harry/ggt-3893-gadgetrecordtojson-should-exclude-the
branch
from
3c32b71
to
06f1ee3
Compare
airhorns
force-pushed
the
harry/ggt-3893-gadgetrecordtojson-should-exclude-the
branch
from
06f1ee3
to
727b1fe
Compare
airhorns
force-pushed
the
harry/ggt-3893-gadgetrecordtojson-should-exclude-the
branch
from
727b1fe
to
6f4f422
Compare
kristianpd
approved these changes
Jun 30, 2023
airhorns
deleted the
harry/ggt-3893-gadgetrecordtojson-should-exclude-the
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Riley noticed a discord user trying to pass
record.toJSON()back as an input to a different action call. This didn't work out of the box because the.toJSON()includes all the fields that came back from loading the record, including__typename. When sending this back at the GraphQL API, the__typenameattribute causes GraphQL to get mad as you are passing fields which don't exist as input fields.