Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix use of package_name attribute on CondaTarget objects #1424

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2024

Conversation

nsoranzo
Copy link
Member

In Galaxy 23.1 galaxy.tool_util.deps.mulled.util.build_target() was changed to return a CondaTarget object instead of a (removed) Target.

To avoid complications, this requires a bump to the galaxy-util and galaxy-tool-util packages to >=23.1 .

Also, add type annotations to most related code.

Fix galaxyproject/galaxy#17378 .

In Galaxy 23.1 `galaxy.tool_util.deps.mulled.util.build_target()`
was changed to return a `CondaTarget` object instead of a (removed)
`Target`.

To avoid complications, this requires a bump to the galaxy-util and
galaxy-tool-util packages to >=23.1 .

Also, add type annotations to most related code.

Fix galaxyproject/galaxy#17378 .
@mvdbeek mvdbeek merged commit 50a6485 into galaxyproject:master Jan 30, 2024
12 of 14 checks passed
@mvdbeek
Copy link
Member

mvdbeek commented Jan 30, 2024

Thank you!

@nsoranzo nsoranzo deleted the fix_CondaTarget_package_name branch January 30, 2024 14:47
@bernt-matthias
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks a lot @nsoranzo.

Should we unpin the planemo monitor again?

@nsoranzo
Copy link
Member Author

Should we unpin the planemo monitor again?

Yes, I think so.

bernt-matthias added a commit to bernt-matthias/planemo-monitor that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2024
@bernt-matthias
Copy link
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CondaTarget misses package_name property
3 participants