Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Edited training material "Automated Cell Annotation" upto slide 10 #5604

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MD-Chem
Copy link

@MD-Chem MD-Chem commented Dec 6, 2024

No description provided.

1. Added a section on Why Cell Annotation is Important

2. Made textual edits to first seven slides.

Went to lunch
Added presenter notes to "Why cell type annotation is important"
Edited until Slide 10
@MD-Chem MD-Chem requested a review from a team as a code owner December 6, 2024 05:06
@nomadscientist
Copy link
Collaborator

This looks awesome, great improvements, just testing on Gitpod to make sure it renders alright


- To understand the composition of cell types in samples (cellular heterogeneity)

- To compare changes in cell populations or states across different condition and phenotypes
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- To compare changes in cell populations or states across different condition and phenotypes
- To compare changes in cell populations or states across different conditions and phenotypes


- Can be done manually or automatically

- Is possible due to single-cell sequencing technology
- Single-cell sequencing technology provides higher resolution than bulk RNA-seq
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like this point is missing something to explicitly link it to the cell annotation - maybe combine it with the start of the old version like 'Is possible because single-cell seq tech provides higher res...'?

Copy link
Collaborator

@MarisaJL MarisaJL left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a couple of comments, but it is rendering fine @nomadscientist

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants