Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add CVE runtime context for MCM and mcm-provider-openstack #553

Merged

Conversation

rishabh-11
Copy link
Contributor

How to categorize this PR?

/area security
/kind enhancement
/platform openstack

What this PR does / why we need it:
Add CVE categorisation/runtime contexts for managed OCI images of MCM and mcm-provider-openstack.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

NONE

@rishabh-11 rishabh-11 requested review from a team as code owners January 23, 2023 05:30
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added area/security Security related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension platform/openstack OpenStack platform/infrastructure needs/review Needs review size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Jan 23, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 23, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 23, 2023
Copy link
Member

@dkistner dkistner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/review Needs review labels Jan 23, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@kon-angelo kon-angelo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@kon-angelo
Copy link
Contributor

/reviewed ok-to-test

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Feb 3, 2023
@kon-angelo kon-angelo merged commit fb06696 into gardener:master Feb 3, 2023
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) label Feb 3, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Feb 3, 2023
dkistner added a commit to gardener/machine-controller-manager-provider-openstack that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2023
The categorization was initially defined here and it transferred as defined to the mcm-provider-openstack repository:
gardener/gardener-extension-provider-openstack#553
himanshu-kun pushed a commit to gardener/machine-controller-manager-provider-openstack that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2023
The categorization was initially defined here and it transferred as defined to the mcm-provider-openstack repository:
gardener/gardener-extension-provider-openstack#553
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/security Security related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) platform/openstack OpenStack platform/infrastructure reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants