Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adapt the priority according to the gardener guideline #126

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 7, 2022

Conversation

krgostev
Copy link
Contributor

@krgostev krgostev commented Jul 7, 2022

How to categorize this PR?

/area quality
/kind enhancement

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR removes the old PriorityClass from the charts and adapt the deployment priorityClassName according to the gardener documentation. Part of #5634

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

This version of gardener-extension-shoot-cert-service requires Gardener v1.50+. 

@krgostev krgostev requested review from a team as code owners July 7, 2022 12:10
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/review Needs review area/quality Output qualification (tests, checks, scans, automation in general, etc.) related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Jul 7, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jul 7, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jul 7, 2022
Copy link
Member

@MartinWeindel MartinWeindel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fix for controller-registration

example/controller-registration.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jul 7, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jul 7, 2022
Copy link
Member

@MartinWeindel MartinWeindel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/review Needs review labels Jul 7, 2022
@MartinWeindel MartinWeindel merged commit a720672 into gardener:master Jul 7, 2022
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) label Jul 7, 2022
@krgostev krgostev deleted the priorityclass branch July 10, 2022 13:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/quality Output qualification (tests, checks, scans, automation in general, etc.) related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants