Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update TF providers #133

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 17, 2023
Merged

Conversation

kon-angelo
Copy link
Contributor

@kon-angelo kon-angelo commented Feb 20, 2023

How to categorize this PR?

/area control-plane
/kind enhancement

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

Update TF_VERSION `0.15.5` -> `1.3.9` and update how the local providers are fetched and stored to be compatible with the latest TF specification.

@kon-angelo kon-angelo requested review from a team as code owners February 20, 2023 15:54
@gardener-robot
Copy link

@kon-angelo Labels area/todo, kind/todo do not exist.

@kon-angelo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/review Needs review size/s Size of pull request is small (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Feb 20, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Feb 20, 2023
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the reviewed/do-not-merge Has no approval for merging as it may break things, be of poor quality or have (ext.) dependencies label Feb 20, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Feb 20, 2023
@kevin-lacoo
Copy link

Hi @kon-angelo , How about alicloud?

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added size/m Size of pull request is medium (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) and removed size/s Size of pull request is small (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Feb 21, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Feb 21, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Feb 21, 2023
@kon-angelo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kevin-lacoo I adapted to work with the new terraform update but I think you may be more qualified to evaluate a provider update

@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Feb 21, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Feb 21, 2023
@kon-angelo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

I performed the following tests for {aws,gcp,openstack,azure}:

  • successful integration test run
  • create infra
  • create infra with existing resources
  • reconcile and delete existing infra

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added area/control-plane Control plane related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension and removed reviewed/do-not-merge Has no approval for merging as it may break things, be of poor quality or have (ext.) dependencies labels Mar 16, 2023
@shaoyongfeng
Copy link
Contributor

Test is done on AliCLoud

Copy link
Member

@MartinWeindel MartinWeindel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@kon-angelo kon-angelo changed the title [WIP] Update TF providers Update TF providers Mar 17, 2023
@kon-angelo kon-angelo merged commit e6ad896 into gardener:master Mar 17, 2023
@kon-angelo kon-angelo deleted the update-tf-providers branch March 17, 2023 13:31
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) and removed needs/review Needs review labels Mar 17, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Mar 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/control-plane Control plane related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) size/m Size of pull request is medium (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants