Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add cve categorisation for terraformer oci images #134

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2023
Merged

Add cve categorisation for terraformer oci images #134

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2023

Conversation

dkistner
Copy link
Member

How to categorize this PR?
/kind enhancement

What this PR does / why we need it:
Add cve categorization for the Terraformer oci images.

Same as #130

We move the cve categorization to the Terraformer repository itself as it can't be taken into consideration when it is defined on the respective provider extension level. Once this is changed we can remove the categorisation here again.
ref: #130 (comment)

cc @ccwienk
/invite @kon-angelo

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

CVE categorization for Terraformer oci images has been added.

@dkistner dkistner requested a review from a team as a code owner February 22, 2023 12:56
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/review Needs review size/s Size of pull request is small (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Feb 22, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Feb 22, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Feb 22, 2023
kon-angelo
kon-angelo approved these changes Feb 22, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@kon-angelo kon-angelo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/review Needs review labels Feb 22, 2023
@kon-angelo kon-angelo merged commit 4a7ed52 into master Feb 22, 2023
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) label Feb 22, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Feb 22, 2023
@MartinWeindel MartinWeindel deleted the enh/cve-categorisation branch February 22, 2023 14:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@kon-angelo kon-angelo kon-angelo approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) size/s Size of pull request is small (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@dkistner @kon-angelo @gardener-robot-ci-1 @gardener-robot-ci-3 @gardener-robot