Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(gatsby): use gatsby root instead of process.cwd #35263

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2022
Merged

fix(gatsby): use gatsby root instead of process.cwd #35263

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2022

Conversation

wardpeet
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Use global root directory instead of process.cwd for cache initialisation

@gatsbot gatsbot bot added the status: triage needed Issue or pull request that need to be triaged and assigned to a reviewer label Mar 30, 2022
@wardpeet wardpeet added type: maintenance An issue or pull request describing a change that isn't a bug, feature or documentation change and removed status: triage needed Issue or pull request that need to be triaged and assigned to a reviewer labels Mar 30, 2022
@wardpeet wardpeet merged commit 039f2cc into master Mar 30, 2022
@wardpeet wardpeet deleted the fix/core-utils-path-exist branch March 30, 2022 17:53
@gatsbybot gatsbybot mentioned this pull request Mar 30, 2022
Merged
wardpeet added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2022
@wardpeet
fix(gatsby): use gatsby root instead of process.cwd (#35263)
7e31056 
(cherry picked from commit 039f2cc)
wardpeet added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2022
@wardpeet
fix(gatsby): use gatsby root instead of process.cwd (#35263)
0003503 
(cherry picked from commit 039f2cc)
wardpeet added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2022
@gatsbybot @wardpeet
fix(gatsby): use gatsby root instead of process.cwd (#35263) (#35264)
c0da030 
Co-authored-by: Ward Peeters <ward@coding-tech.com>
@marvinjude
Copy link
Contributor

Published in gatsby@4.11.1

@ascorbic ascorbic mentioned this pull request Apr 13, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@abhiaiyer91 abhiaiyer91 abhiaiyer91 approved these changes

@pieh pieh pieh approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type: maintenance An issue or pull request describing a change that isn't a bug, feature or documentation change
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@wardpeet @marvinjude @pieh @abhiaiyer91