Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ChainedIterable Duplicate Class #266

Closed
GCHQDev404 opened this issue May 6, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #267
Closed

ChainedIterable Duplicate Class #266

GCHQDev404 opened this issue May 6, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #267
Labels
enhancement Improvement to existing functionality/feature
Milestone

Comments

@GCHQDev404
Copy link
Contributor

linked to : ChainedIterable Duplicated Classes. #2369

Make ChainedIterable public

GCHQDev404 added a commit that referenced this issue May 6, 2022
@t92549 t92549 added the enhancement Improvement to existing functionality/feature label May 6, 2022
@t92549 t92549 added this to the v2.2.0 milestone May 6, 2022
@t92549
Copy link
Contributor

t92549 commented May 6, 2022

To fix the issue of duplicating the ChainedIterable class between koryphe and Gaffer, they should be made public in koryhpe. Then they can be removed from Gaffer, replacing all Gaffer references to the public koryphe version: gchq/Gaffer#2369.

t92549 added a commit that referenced this issue May 6, 2022
t92549 added a commit that referenced this issue May 6, 2022
t92549 added a commit that referenced this issue May 6, 2022
t92549 added a commit that referenced this issue May 6, 2022
* gh-266 ChainedIterable made public

* gh-266 ChainedIterable made public - typo

* gh-266: Moved out all Iterable classes into iterable module

* gh-266: Spotless apply

* gh-256: Moved over constructors and tests from Gaffer

* gh-266: Added more iterable tests

* gh-266: Cleanup and add more constructors

* gh-266: Tidy up null check on list

Co-authored-by: GCHQDev404 <GCHQDev404@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: t92549 <80890692+t92549@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improvement to existing functionality/feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants