Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make it easier to search by PMIDs #285

Closed
cmungall opened this issue Dec 7, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Make it easier to search by PMIDs #285

cmungall opened this issue Dec 7, 2015 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@cmungall
Copy link
Member

cmungall commented Dec 7, 2015

E.g.

  • add a grebe template
  • allow typing of PMID:nnnn into search field on annotation search (seems to tokenize too early now)
  • add PMID page (thought we had a separate ticket? can't find)
@cmungall cmungall added this to the wishlist milestone Dec 7, 2015
@kltm
Copy link
Member

kltm commented Dec 7, 2015

  • Easy.
  • There is another issue about stuff like this in here somewhere (related to Allow search for internal identifiers (was: "Cannot search for dictyBase gene IDs") #120 constellation). You can, however, apparently currently search for 25281747 and "PMID:25281747" in annotation fairly effectively as a temporary workaround.
  • Wasn't the PMID page a monarch proposal? I can't remember having it here before. The idea would be to get that information from elsewhere/pre-load it and then have it and all loaded PMID annotation info?

@cmungall
Copy link
Member Author

cmungall commented Dec 7, 2015

  1. cool!
  2. Ah, I think I was searching using a PMID we didn't have. In which case the results are unintuitive, as everything matches "PMID"
  3. Would be good to have for GO. Could move over mon component when done

@cmungall
Copy link
Member Author

Grebe template not a high priority (don't recall where this came from).

The others covered in the #349 and #120 so closing this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants