Remove outstanding issue with release of JSON-LD 1.1 #49
Conversation
With the release of [JSON-LD 1.1](https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/) is this still an issue? Looking at this comment as a reference w3c/json-ld-syntax#7 (comment)
|
@mejackreed I haven't been able to follow JSON-LD very closely in the past 3 years. I'll need to rely on someone else to say whether it is still an issue. |
|
As I understand, it is solved with this construction: |
|
@azaroth42 would you be able to confirm this isn't an issue anymore in JSON-LD 1.1 ? |
|
Yes, arrays of arrays work as expected in JSON-LD 1.1 :) That said, there's also a native JSON datatype that would potentially obviate the need for GeoJSON-LD completely ... unless you want to do semantic processing of the geoJson structure. So it depends on what the intent is ... if it's to embed GeoJSON as a blob, then use JSON datatype. If it's to enrich GeoJSON with additional semantics, then use the array of arrays. |
| of JSON-LD 1.0. There are no current best practices for addressing this issue. | ||
| Applications that process GeoJSON as JSON-LD using the GeoJSON-LD 1.0 context | ||
| must take extra steps not defined here to ensure that geometric coordinates | ||
| are processed appropriately. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mejackreed @azaroth42 what would you think about, instead of removing this entire paragraph, leaving the first sentence (still true for JSON-LD 1.0) and adding another sentence explaining that it is no longer a problem with JSON-LD 1.1?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mejackreed @azaroth42 ping?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That seems ok to me! Would you like me to make that change?
With the release of JSON-LD 1.1 is this still an issue?
Looking at this comment as a reference w3c/json-ld-syntax#7 (comment)