Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #1329. Use layer params in GFI #1330

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 7, 2016

Conversation

offtherailz
Copy link
Member

  • Now the getFeatureInfo gets the params from the layer.
  • The params are overridable by the params property of the feature info (the tool was using them only in the previous implementation)
  • Fixed the excludeParameter filter to add parameter properly (before it was sending to the server a json called params)
  • Add a unit test for this

 - Now the getFeatureInfo gets the params from the layer.
 - The params are overridable by the params property of the feature info (the tool was using them only in the previous implementation)
 - Fixed the excludeParameter filter to add parameter properly (before it was sending to the server a json called params)
 - Add a unit test for this
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.06%) to 80.23% when pulling 2d37b1f on offtherailz:i_1359 into 849255d on geosolutions-it:master.

@offtherailz offtherailz merged commit 37d6142 into geosolutions-it:master Dec 7, 2016
offtherailz added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2016
- Now the getFeatureInfo gets the params from the layer.
 - The params are overridable by the params property of the feature info (the tool was using them only in the previous implementation)
 - Fixed the excludeParameter filter to add parameter properly (before it was sending to the server a json called params)
 - Add a unit test for this
@offtherailz offtherailz deleted the i_1359 branch January 26, 2018 10:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants