add support to print list of implemented steps

[sriv]

usage: gauge list --steps

fixes #2432

Signed-off-by: sriv srikanth.ddit@gmail.com

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results

java_simple_serial.csv

Commit	CPU	Memory	Time	ExitCode
77e1343	32%	61496	0:20.52	0
523c400	33%	63508	0:20.32	0
9b96118	25%	63568	0:16.12	0
eead0b1	32%	65472	0:17.01	0

java_gradle_serial.csv

Commit	CPU	Memory	Time	ExitCode
77e1343	6%	94364	0:40.44	0
523c400	6%	121532	0:45.13	0
9b96118	6%	96004	0:42.09	0
eead0b1	6%	96192	0:31.32	0

java_maven_parallel.csv

Commit	CPU	Memory	Time	ExitCode
77e1343	35%	179656	0:34.40	0
523c400	33%	182012	0:32.36	0
9b96118	36%	193468	0:31.56	0
eead0b1	42%	237416	0:31.56	0

java_gradle_parallel.csv

Commit	CPU	Memory	Time	ExitCode
77e1343	5%	122608	0:46.91	0
523c400	5%	125048	0:37.07	0
9b96118	5%	124252	0:39.01	0
eead0b1	5%	115400	0:44.12	0

java_simple_parallel.csv

Commit	CPU	Memory	Time	ExitCode
77e1343	22%	63788	0:28.84	0
523c400	20%	65628	0:21.50	0
9b96118	20%	65668	0:27.20	0
eead0b1	23%	71984	0:23.81	0

java_maven_serial.csv

Commit	CPU	Memory	Time	ExitCode
77e1343	53%	198284	0:29.23	0
523c400	51%	205508	0:32.16	0
9b96118	40%	201760	0:33.93	0
eead0b1	75%	238976	0:20.09	0

java_maven_multithreaded.csv

Commit	CPU	Memory	Time	ExitCode
77e1343	44%	181400	0:32.12	0
523c400	49%	186688	0:22.21	0
9b96118	41%	178280	0:29.67	0
eead0b1	66%	242792	0:16.94	0

java_gradle_multithreaded.csv

Commit	CPU	Memory	Time	ExitCode
77e1343	7%	97300	0:28.57	0
523c400	6%	102056	0:32.84	0
9b96118	6%	120580	0:36.40	0
eead0b1	9%	119884	0:22.20	0

java_simple_multithreaded.csv

Commit	CPU	Memory	Time	ExitCode
77e1343	26%	63556	0:13.94	0
523c400	27%	65596	0:13.36	0
9b96118	24%	63564	0:14.41	0
eead0b1	17%	63604	0:22.95	0

Notes

• The results above are generated by running against seed projects in https://github.com/getgauge/gauge-benchmark
• These results are not persisted, but on merging to master the benchmark will be rerun.
• These benchmark are run in Github Actions' agents, which are virtualized. Results are not to be taken as actual benchmarks.Rather, these are indicative numbers and make sense for comparison.

---

See Workflow log for more details.

[Elwis28]

@sriv is there a plan to finish this? It would be a very good addition to gauge.

[zabil]

Tested this as follows and all is good

⋊> gauge init js                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
Successfully initialized the project. Run specifications with "npm test" in project root.
⋊> gauge list --steps                                                                                                                                                                        16:26:50
[Steps]
Add task <item>
Add tasks <table>
Clear all tasks
Complete tasks <table>
Must display <message>
Must have <table>
Must not have <table>
Open todo application
View <type> tasks

[chadlwilson]

Sigh, PyPi CLI release broken somehow again :-( Might be one of the setuptools bumps - seems to have started creating getgauge_cli instead of getgauge-cli.

BAD https://github.com/getgauge/gauge/actions/runs/8988550261/job/24689918571
last GOOD https://github.com/getgauge/gauge/actions/runs/8594066411/job/23546632610

Does anyone use that Python-installed CLI I wonder? :-/

[chadlwilson]

Filed at #2536 for now. (ignore: rubber ducked my way to fixing it, should be OK for next release - probably no rush)

[zabil]

Does anyone use that Python-installed CLI I wonder? :-/

Not sure if we can fully trust this, but it seems like it's being downloaded a lot. From https://pypistats.org/packages/getgauge

[chadlwilson]

Not sure if the stats can be trusted either but the package in question here (the CLI installer) is https://pypistats.org/packages/getgauge-cli rather than the other one (the python language support)

[zabil]

Ah yes you are right. So it's something around like

Downloads last day: 1
Downloads last week: 64
Downloads last month: 213

I am not sure how to interpret it. But it looks like there is decent usage.