Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add an option 'Skip TLS verification' to Elasticsearch query runnner #4416

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

miyakelp
Copy link

@miyakelp miyakelp commented Dec 1, 2019

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

  • Feature

Description

Add support for Elasticsearch using self signed certificate.
If skip TLS verification is enabled, set verify option of requests.get as False.

Related Tickets & Document

#2791

Mobile & Desktop Screenshots/Recordings (if there are UI changes)

es_tls_desktop
es_tls_mobile

@miyakelp miyakelp force-pushed the skip_es_tls_verification branch from ec2126c to 925373e Compare December 1, 2019 08:35
@jsanant
Copy link

jsanant commented Mar 23, 2021

@arikfr - Can this conflict be fixed? We are running ES with TLS and we need to leverage this feature.

@Vinutha-Garimella
Copy link

Hi, do we have this feature merged for redash 9 beta version.? I am facing the same issue as #2791
We are not able execute the query for self signed elasticsearch url

@guidopetri
Copy link
Contributor

@miyakelp , thanks for the PR! We've updated a lot of things now that we're Community-driven so - if you're still interested in getting this merged - would you mind rebasing off master to re-run the CI, as well as updating merge conflicts?

We're trying to clean up our PR todo list, so if you're not interested, that's fine - we'll close the PR in about a week if we don't hear back. If you're interested in reopening the PR afterwards, we would also very much welcome that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants