Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(dev): Check out correct commit in manual GHA Build & Test workflow #4954

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 20, 2022

Conversation

lobsterkatie
Copy link
Member

Our Build & Test GHA workflow can be triggered manually, and when you trigger it, you can either pick the branch to run it on or give it a specific commit to test. The former works fine, but the latter does not - though it picks up the given commit and correctly puts it in the env, it doesn't actually use that value when checking out the commit, instead always relying on the default value. This fixes that by always specifying what value to use.

@lobsterkatie lobsterkatie force-pushed the kmclb-use-commit-input-in-CI branch from d538881 to 8abe79b Compare April 19, 2022 22:34
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

size-limit report 📦

Path Size
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified) 20.23 KB (+0.85% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (minified) 64.4 KB (-0.22% 🔽)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified) 18.86 KB (+0.46% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (minified) 58.05 KB (+0.18% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (gzipped + minified) 23.42 KB (+0.9% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (minified) 81.29 KB (-1.41% 🔽)
@sentry/react - Webpack (gzipped + minified) 23.46 KB (+0.9% 🔺)
@sentry/nextjs Client - Webpack (gzipped + minified) 48 KB (+0.01% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified) 26.08 KB (+0.39% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified) 24.45 KB (+0.17% 🔺)

@lobsterkatie lobsterkatie changed the title fix(dev): Check out correct commit in GHA Build & Test workflow fix(dev): Check out correct commit in manual GHA Build & Test workflow Apr 19, 2022
@lobsterkatie lobsterkatie merged commit ff810cb into 7.x Apr 20, 2022
@lobsterkatie lobsterkatie deleted the kmclb-use-commit-input-in-CI branch April 20, 2022 01:27
AbhiPrasad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2022
…low (#4954)

Our `Build & Test` GHA workflow can be triggered manually, and when you trigger it, you can either pick the branch to run it on or give it a specific commit to test. The former works fine, but the latter does not - though it picks up the given commit and correctly puts it in the env, it doesn't actually use that value when checking out the commit, instead always relying on the default value. This fixes that by always specifying what value to use.
onurtemizkan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2022
…low (#4954)

Our `Build & Test` GHA workflow can be triggered manually, and when you trigger it, you can either pick the branch to run it on or give it a specific commit to test. The former works fine, but the latter does not - though it picks up the given commit and correctly puts it in the env, it doesn't actually use that value when checking out the commit, instead always relying on the default value. This fixes that by always specifying what value to use.
onurtemizkan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2022
…low (#4954)

Our `Build & Test` GHA workflow can be triggered manually, and when you trigger it, you can either pick the branch to run it on or give it a specific commit to test. The former works fine, but the latter does not - though it picks up the given commit and correctly puts it in the env, it doesn't actually use that value when checking out the commit, instead always relying on the default value. This fixes that by always specifying what value to use.
@AbhiPrasad AbhiPrasad added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Apr 25, 2022
Lms24 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2022
…low (#4954)

Our `Build & Test` GHA workflow can be triggered manually, and when you trigger it, you can either pick the branch to run it on or give it a specific commit to test. The former works fine, but the latter does not - though it picks up the given commit and correctly puts it in the env, it doesn't actually use that value when checking out the commit, instead always relying on the default value. This fixes that by always specifying what value to use.
lobsterkatie added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2022
…low (#4954)

Our `Build & Test` GHA workflow can be triggered manually, and when you trigger it, you can either pick the branch to run it on or give it a specific commit to test. The former works fine, but the latter does not - though it picks up the given commit and correctly puts it in the env, it doesn't actually use that value when checking out the commit, instead always relying on the default value. This fixes that by always specifying what value to use.
lobsterkatie added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2022
…low (#4954)

Our `Build & Test` GHA workflow can be triggered manually, and when you trigger it, you can either pick the branch to run it on or give it a specific commit to test. The former works fine, but the latter does not - though it picks up the given commit and correctly puts it in the env, it doesn't actually use that value when checking out the commit, instead always relying on the default value. This fixes that by always specifying what value to use.
AbhiPrasad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 30, 2022
…low (#4954)

Our `Build & Test` GHA workflow can be triggered manually, and when you trigger it, you can either pick the branch to run it on or give it a specific commit to test. The former works fine, but the latter does not - though it picks up the given commit and correctly puts it in the env, it doesn't actually use that value when checking out the commit, instead always relying on the default value. This fixes that by always specifying what value to use.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants