Invalidation updates && improvements

[paul-paliychuk]

🚀	This description was created by Ellipsis for commit 6a97e9f

Summary:

This PR refines deduplication and invalidation processes in the graph database and core/graphiti.py, prioritizing invalidated edges and enhancing semantic similarity handling.

Key points:

• Refine deduplication and invalidation in graph database and core/graphiti.py.
• Prioritize invalidated edges over deduplicated ones in add_episode.
• Add dedupe_extracted_edges_v2 for improved edge deduplication.
• Update add_episode for better node extraction and edge invalidation.
• Introduce extract_node_and_edge_triplets for enhanced edge processing.
• Improve semantic similarity handling in edge deduplication.
• Modify invalidate_edges to include episode context.
• Update safely_parse_db_date for better date handling from Neo4j.
• Update core/prompts/dedupe_edges.py to refine edge deduplication logic in v1, v2, and edge_list functions.

---

Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 7eb836e in 37 seconds

More details

• Looked at 645 lines of code in 9 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 6 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. core/graphiti.py:138

• Draft comment:
  Redundant logging statement for extracted nodes. This line duplicates the log at line 128 and can be removed to avoid confusion.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The code in core/graphiti.py has a redundant logging statement for extracted nodes. This is unnecessary and can be removed to avoid confusion and clutter in the logs.

2. core/prompts/dedupe_edges.py:74

• Draft comment:
  Consider using context['new_edges'] instead of context['extracted_edges'] for consistency with the task description.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  In core/prompts/dedupe_edges.py, the v2 function has a minor issue where it uses json.dumps on context['extracted_edges'] instead of context['new_edges']. This could lead to confusion or errors if the context keys are not consistent.

3. core/prompts/invalidate_edges.py:38

• Draft comment:
  The format string for edges should match the description provided in the prompt. Ensure the format includes both the fact and timestamp as described.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  In core/prompts/invalidate_edges.py, the prompt format for edges includes a fact and timestamp, but the format string in the code does not match this description. This could lead to inconsistencies in the LLM's understanding of the task.

4. core/utils/maintenance/edge_operations.py:227

• Draft comment:
  Use existing_edges instead of extracted_edges when preparing the context for LLM to ensure correct deduplication results.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  In core/utils/maintenance/edge_operations.py, the dedupe_extracted_edges_v2 function incorrectly uses extracted_edges instead of existing_edges when preparing the context for LLM. This could lead to incorrect deduplication results.

5. core/utils/maintenance/node_operations.py:162

• Draft comment:
  The comment indicates a temporary hack. Consider refactoring this section for better maintainability and robustness.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  In core/utils/maintenance/node_operations.py, the dedupe_extracted_nodes function has a comment indicating a temporary hack. This suggests the code may not be robust or maintainable.

6. core/utils/search/search_utils.py:236

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding exception handling in safely_parse_db_date to handle potential parsing errors gracefully.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  In core/utils/search/search_utils.py, the safely_parse_db_date function should handle potential exceptions when parsing dates to ensure robustness.

Workflow ID: wflow_fM2zfqH6zm80Vd4u

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 80612c4 in 39 seconds

More details

• Looked at 1148 lines of code in 6 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. core/graphiti.py:161

• Draft comment:
  Remove commented-out code for dedupe_extracted_edges_v2 if it's not needed.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The code in core/graphiti.py has a potential issue with the commented-out code for dedupe_extracted_edges_v2. The new deduplication function dedupe_extracted_edges is used instead, but the commented-out code should be removed if it's not needed.

Workflow ID: wflow_Ztp7sh16kl5ijjdK

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 03ad8cf in 14 seconds

More details

• Looked at 60 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. core/prompts/dedupe_edges.py:7

• Draft comment:
  Inconsistent indentation: mix of tabs and spaces. Use one style consistently throughout the file.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The indentation in the file is inconsistent, using both tabs and spaces. This can lead to readability issues and potential errors in some environments.

Workflow ID: wflow_OLCDOBolulMb7Bbl

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 6a97e9f in 13 seconds

More details

• Looked at 41 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. core/graphiti.py:183

• Draft comment:
  Consider refactoring the deduplication and invalidation logic into a separate function to improve code reusability and readability. This pattern is repeated in multiple places.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The code for deduplication and invalidation of edges is repeated in multiple places, which can lead to maintenance issues and potential bugs if changes are needed in the future. It would be better to refactor this into a separate function to improve code reusability and readability.

Workflow ID: wflow_HUXITS2ywikq2zJh

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.