feat: Add CLA Assistant workflow and CONTRIBUTING guidelines #32
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add a new GitHub Actions workflow file to handle the CLA Assistant functionality. Also, include a CONTRIBUTING.md file with guidelines for contributing to the project.
danielchalef
temporarily deployed
to
development
GitHub Actions
Inactive
danielchalef
temporarily deployed
to
development
GitHub Actions
Inactive
danielchalef
temporarily deployed
to
development
GitHub Actions
Inactive
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 12d0711 in 11 seconds
More details
- Looked at
330lines of code in4files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/cla.yml:20
- Draft comment:
The 'if' condition is overly complex and may not work as intended. Consider simplifying it by using 'contains' for checking comment body or splitting conditions for clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is focused on a specific line that was added in this PR, which is good. The suggestion to simplify the 'if' condition could be a valid code quality improvement, as simpler conditions are easier to read and maintain. However, the comment does not specify exactly how the condition might fail, which makes it slightly speculative. Still, the suggestion to use 'contains' or split conditions could be actionable.
The comment could be seen as speculative since it doesn't provide evidence of the condition failing. It also doesn't provide a specific alternative solution, which might make it less actionable.
Even though the comment is somewhat speculative, it does point out a potential area for code improvement, which aligns with the rules for suggesting code quality refactors.
The comment should be kept as it suggests a potential code quality improvement that is actionable, even if it is slightly speculative.
Workflow ID: wflow_m3aGStokxbZd26pQ
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
paul-paliychuk
approved these changes
Aug 23, 2024
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
This PR adds a CLA Assistant workflow, a Code of Conduct, contributing guidelines, and a Contributor License Agreement to streamline contributions and ensure compliance with community and legal standards.
Key points:
.github/workflows/cla.ymlto automate CLA checks using CLA Assistant.CODE_OF_CONDUCT.mdto establish community behavior standards.CONTRIBUTING.mdto guide contributors on how to contribute to the project.Zep-CLA.mddetailing the Contributor License Agreement terms.Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev