Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update status and roadmap section #53

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

paul-paliychuk
Copy link
Collaborator

@paul-paliychuk paul-paliychuk commented Aug 27, 2024

🚀 This description was created by Ellipsis for commit 5a513ce

Summary:

Updated Status and Roadmap in README.md to clarify development efforts and future goals for graphiti, removing a line about GitHub updates.

Key points:

  • Updated Status and Roadmap section in README.md.
  • Clarified ongoing development efforts and future goals for graphiti.
  • Focus areas: performance, scalability, LLM models, embedder interface, custom graph schemas, CRUD operations, retrieval capabilities, test coverage.
  • Removed line directing users to GitHub for updates.

Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 747b12d in 11 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 35 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 2 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. README.md:339
  • Draft comment:
    The phrase 'with an upper limit' is vague. Consider specifying what the upper limit is or providing more context for clarity.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The updated roadmap section in the README.md is clear and well-structured. However, the phrase 'Latency currently scales sublinearly with graph size, with an upper limit.' could be made clearer by specifying what the upper limit is or providing more context.
2. README.md:339
  • Draft comment:
    Consider adding a brief explanation about what 'sublinear scaling of latency with graph size' means for clarity.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The updated section in the README.md file is clear and concise. However, it could benefit from a brief comment explaining the sublinear scaling of latency with graph size, as this might be a complex concept for some readers.

Workflow ID: wflow_VmHctSKtWnPTrsGY


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 9feecdd in 18 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 29 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 2 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. README.md:338
  • Draft comment:
    Consider re-adding the latency information as it provides useful context about current performance.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The PR description mentions updating the 'Status and Roadmap' section to clarify ongoing development efforts and future goals. The changes in the diff reflect this update, but the removal of the latency information seems unintentional as it provides useful context about current performance.
2. README.md:339
  • Draft comment:
    Avoid mentioning secrets or credentials like API keys in the documentation. Consider using environment variables or configuration files to manage them securely.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 80%
    The README.md file does not contain any Python code that requires a copyright notice. However, the file does mention the use of an OpenAI API key, which could be considered a secret or credential. This should be addressed.

Workflow ID: wflow_cD5i8lumTMZYxCSS


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 5a513ce in 21 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 12 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. README.md:337
  • Draft comment:
    Consider re-adding the line directing users to GitHub for the latest updates and release notes to ensure they know where to find the most current information.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The removal of the line directing users to GitHub for updates might lead to confusion about where to find the latest information.

Workflow ID: wflow_EXH9JyIn6Xu9cDri


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

@danielchalef danielchalef merged commit 398e1c1 into main Aug 27, 2024
5 checks passed
@danielchalef danielchalef deleted the update-readme-status-and-roadmap branch August 27, 2024 18:01
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 27, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants