llama : update llm_build_copy_mask_state comment [no ci] #9385
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit updates the comment, which seems to contain a typo or be an outdated comment, in the copy_mask_state function changing the variable n_rs to n_kv. I believe this change is correct and what the comment wants to convey is to copy the states that are not going to be used in the upcoming processing, which are the tokens states from n_seqs up to the number of possible token states n_kv.
compilade
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks. This comes from the subset of #7531 included in #8526. Seems like when renaming n_rs to n_kv, I forgot to update that comment.
It will be changed back to n_rs as part of #7531, because that will be the appropriate name when the recurrent state cache will be separated from the self-attention kv cache. But I agree that right now this is a typo.
dsx1986
pushed a commit
to dsx1986/llama.cpp
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
) This commit updates the comment, which seems to contain a typo or be an outdated comment, in the copy_mask_state function changing the variable n_rs to n_kv. I believe this change is correct and what the comment wants to convey is to copy the states that are not going to be used in the upcoming processing, which are the tokens states from n_seqs up to the number of possible token states n_kv.
arthw
pushed a commit
to arthw/llama.cpp
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2024
) This commit updates the comment, which seems to contain a typo or be an outdated comment, in the copy_mask_state function changing the variable n_rs to n_kv. I believe this change is correct and what the comment wants to convey is to copy the states that are not going to be used in the upcoming processing, which are the tokens states from n_seqs up to the number of possible token states n_kv.
arthw
pushed a commit
to arthw/llama.cpp
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2024
) This commit updates the comment, which seems to contain a typo or be an outdated comment, in the copy_mask_state function changing the variable n_rs to n_kv. I believe this change is correct and what the comment wants to convey is to copy the states that are not going to be used in the upcoming processing, which are the tokens states from n_seqs up to the number of possible token states n_kv.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit updates the comment, which seems to contain a typo or be an outdated comment, in the copy_mask_state function changing the variable n_rs to n_kv.
I believe this change is correct and what the comment wants to convey is to copy the states that are not going to be used in the upcoming processing, which are the tokens states from n_seqs up to the number of possible token states n_kv.