feat: force to generate for non-required fields

[elecay]

Changes:

• Allow to create strings of any length. If the generated string ends with a space, it will be changed to a dot (eg. 'at.' instead of 'at '. Just to avoid confusion.
• Allow to generate data even for non-required fields (similar to: Polyfactory allow_none_optionals). The value should be a float between 0.0 and 1.0, indicating the probability of allowing getting a None value. 0.0 means "0% chances of getting a None", 1.0 means "100% chances of getting a None", 0.5 means "50% chances of getting a None", etc. The default is 0.5.
• Minor improvements

[elecay]

See: How to Make an Immutable Dict in Python

[marcosmadr]

This feature to force non required fields is something that I was also looking for, would you have an ETA to release this?

[albertferras-vrf]

@ghandic could you check this? Would really like to have this feature available included.
Thanks :)

[ghandic]

Hey, I've added feedback to the PR, would like to keep the Lorem strings and also have the allow_none_optionals be a float [0-1] which sets the probability for none to be provided as optionals

[elecay]

Hey, I've added feedback to the PR, would like to keep the Lorem strings and also have the allow_none_optionals be a float [0-1] which sets the probability for none to be provided as optionals

Ey @ghandic. I cannot see any feedback in the PR. Anyway:

1. I suppose we can keep the Lorem as the base string (maybe create substrings of it?). The main thing is that currently, it is not possible to create a string of a specific range (or lower than 3).

2. Not sure about what you said with "allow_none_optionals be a float [0-1] which sets the probability for none to be provided as optionals". The whole idea is to force to a non-null value. In the description of the PR you can see the behavior with Polyfactory.

[ghandic]

Must be issues with GH mobile, these are my comments

[albertferras-vrf]

@ghandic the Pending label suggests that you didn't submit your Review. You have a 'draft review' with comments in it but need to submit it (approve/reject/requestchanges) so that others can see it :)

[elecay]

@ghandic changes applied.

[ghandic]

Overall looking good, I'll work on another PR to spice up the lorem a little bit after this is merged

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (5cbcd0d) 99.19% compared to head (90c6297) 99.21%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #91      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.19%   99.21%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          31       31              
  Lines        1116     1148      +32     
==========================================
+ Hits         1107     1139      +32     
  Misses          9        9              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.